lukless accuracy in CPQ
basilmarket.com forums : Mage  |  15 posts archived
« prev list next » thread 563 of 1,033  (arrow keys work)
thread starter Sw1tchBlade Jul 25 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
Hi everyone. Im currently level 31 with my lukless f/p wizard and doing CPQ. BUt when I do room 3/4, i barely hit the toy trojans. I would say i miss about 60 percent of the time. About what level would i start hitting them 100%? thanks
tyrant2900 07/25/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
in a few levels you should be able to 100% hit them except when the other team boosts their avoidability, and i think at lvl 40+ or so you should be able to hit them 100% no matter what.
FienDkilleRz 07/25/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
Lets just say at lvl 43 Unfunded Luckless F/P > Unfunded Sin. at rombots ^_^, and thats all that matters right? You also get like 16% per a win if u solo rombots.
iProxD 07/25/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
you have 100% because INT increases magic mastery, which gives you a higher accuracy as well as higher damage. and as tyrant2900 pointed out, you'll have problems with avoid up. but if you're lukless, i would say you'll have problems until lv 42 not 40. depending on what lv your firearrow is
chris1996x 07/25/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
y do u ppl like to make f/p? be a i/l
KazeKishi Jul 25 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
They are the highest level monsters in cpq I think at lvl37 or 38. Whenever I would use my 2nd comp to leech my newbs with my warriors, I had to ask for robos or rombots (rombots if they were able to summon well enough) because trojans would never give them any party exp until lvl32 or 33. I forgot when they start getting party exp without having to hit the trojans. edit: Int does not effect magic mastery, skill level of the skill gives that only. Lukless of course naturally (with same funding) have less magic accuracy because 1 Luk benefits more magic accuracy than 1 int.
eswarrr Jul 25 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
To all the people, who are misinformed about magical accuracy To sum up:Neither int nor luk affect magic accuracy more , they both contribute the same in terms magic accuracy. Also, I have never heard of the term magic mastery, what is it? To the TS: You will start to hit it in a couple of levels.
Sw1tchBlade 07/25/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
kay guys thanks alot
Todesser 07/25/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
eswarrr said: " To all the people, who are misinformed about magical accuracy To sum up:Neither int nor luk affect magic accuracy more , they both contribute the same in terms magic accuracy. Also, I have never heard of the term magic mastery, what is it? To the TS: You will start to hit it in a couple of levels." win! Btw. i remember gandalf posting, that luk might afect the m.acc more if you are much lower leveld than the mob and int if you are near the level. I am not quite sure if i remember correclty =/ Even if he said something like this, nothing is proofen yet
eswarrr 07/25/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
Todesser said: " win! Btw. i remember gandalf posting, that luk might afect the m.acc more if you are much lower leveld than the mob and int if you are near the level. I am not quite sure if i remember correclty =/ Even if he said something like this, nothing is proofen yet" Well that was one myth as well. Int and Luk affects accuracy the same at every single point of time.
valint9 07/25/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
FienDkilleRz said: "Lets just say at lvl 43 Unfunded Luckless F/P > Unfunded Sin. at rombots ^_^, and thats all that matters right? You also get like 16% per a win if u solo rombots." HAHA no.
WhiteKeat 07/25/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
chris1996x said: "y do u ppl like to make f/p? be a i/l" You fail. Anyone can choose whatever class they wish to in this game. Not everyone has to be all about damage.
Spike121 07/26/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
mmm huge fail in this thread unfortunately. Mages use magic accuracy, not physical accuracy, so when your opponents summon avoidability up, it doesnt affect mages at all.
VoidKnight 07/26/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
Spike121 said: "mmm huge fail in this thread unfortunately. Mages use magic accuracy, not physical accuracy, so when your opponents summon avoidability up, it doesnt affect mages at all." It does. I know from experience.
Tatterdragon 07/26/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
Spike121 said: "mmm huge fail in this thread unfortunately. Mages use magic accuracy, not physical accuracy, so when your opponents summon avoidability up, it doesnt affect mages at all." I think you may be thinking of blindness, which reduces your physical accuracy. Mages are completely unaffected by blindness because it affects physical accuracy, which they don't use. Avoidability up does affect a magician's hit-rate though, as the formula for calculating the hit-rate takes the monster's avoidability into consideration. Avoidability up can be a problem, but blindness never bothers mages. On topic: You can use the calculator here to help see when you can hit your target monsters if you like. =)
« prev list next » thread 563 of 1,033  (arrow keys work)