F/P mages after Big Bang?
thread starter darkcast Jul 30 2010
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| so after big bang update F/P VS I/L which one wins? |
My Characters: DarkCast112 - 73 Scania F/P Mage
gamerdude292 08/03/10
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
 | [quote] quebecois26 : This thread in the dps section should give you a general idea: http://www.basilmarket.com/forum/1554787/1/The_quotBig_Bangquot__KMST_Revamp.html# dont forget thats on neutral monsters, so if u multi damage of elemental class by 1.25 F/P is #1 in all categories :P [/quote] That chart is incorrect. GROSSLY incorrect. |
My Characters: FrozNlite - 200 Khaini F/P Arch Mage
quebecois26 08/03/10
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| i dont want them to be all equal because it would make the class with the ''easiest'' gameplay better... dont forget, u gotta take movement speed / difficulty of gameplay / party buff in consideration so no, i dont want equality, but i want fairness in balance each aspect of a character so that no class are being ruled out as being ''fail''. |
My Characters: Kortius - 149 Yellonde Paladin
Grimmjow44 08/03/10
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| [quote] gamerdude292 : That chart is incorrect. GROSSLY incorrect. [/quote] wat? how is it incorrect? D: |
My Characters: Haphestus15 - 137 Windia F/P Arch Mage
pancakes030 08/04/10
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| [quote] Grimmjow44 : wat? how is it incorrect? D: [/quote] becuase it's not correct . |
My Characters: squishy030 - 95 Scania F/P Mage
gamerdude292 08/04/10
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
 | The table does not take into account changed formulas beyond the new damage formula (in other words, it reuses the formulas we currently have, but with a changed damage formula). I don't think it even takes into account the recently changed multipliers in the damage formula. On top of that, it was shown that the equips given to each class for "balanced" comparisons are completely illogical. Like Reverse Staves for F/Ps instead of Elemental Weapons. |
My Characters: FrozNlite - 200 Khaini F/P Arch Mage
Grimmjow44 08/04/10
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| [quote] pancakes030 : becuase it's not correct . [/quote] details f3 |
My Characters: Haphestus15 - 137 Windia F/P Arch Mage
bazukakias 08/05/10
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| this is a genelar view from both jobs: ....i started my i/l 2 years ago atm he is 114lvl.... to lvl him till 114 i did 1,3 years(a friend gave me most of my equips like cape,shield and overall)i quit him cause he was boring A LOT... after some months i saw some f/p vids and i understand that i wasted my time making an i/l... the next day i maked an f/p and in 4 months i get him to 120!(btw 4th job(and skeles when i was 125lvl) come to ems when i was 132lvl)f/p wizard is a bit difficult but if u know where to train it will be easy....mage is very fast if u know how to train and ArchMage is faster!in conclusion wizardi/l>f/p,mage i/l <<<<<<f/p and archmage i/l<f/p(more dmg(ex.chain lighting<fire demon)i really wasting my time making this i/l now i could be 180+.... And now about about the bigbang update, i dunno have much exp from this upadate cause i am not korean >_>'' but from what i have seen so far i think we will be better than i/l because paralyze>cl, fire demon>ice demon,meteor>blizzard... |
My Characters: bazukakias - 163 KradiaEMS F/P Arch Mage
Grimmjow44 08/06/10
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| [quote] gamerdude292 : The table does not take into account changed formulas beyond the new damage formula (in other words, it reuses the formulas we currently have, but with a changed damage formula). I don't think it even takes into account the recently changed multipliers in the damage formula. On top of that, it was shown that the equips given to each class for "balanced" comparisons are completely illogical. Like Reverse Staves for F/Ps instead of Elemental Weapons. [/quote] so...ur saying AM's in general r going to be better than wat the chart says? |
My Characters: Haphestus15 - 137 Windia F/P Arch Mage
cookie4mesos 08/06/10
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| Pancakes wins the thread. [quote] pancakes030 : i agree . we should all looks at the facts . fire is super effective on ice . poison & electric are regular effective on each other . but fart is just win . ergo , fp>il . [/quote] I'd like to expand on this. In Pok'emon, yeah, Fire is super effective against Ice. I think it works naturally more like in ToS, where they counteract each other: the Fire melts the Ice, but the Ice becomes Water which puts out the fire, but the heat is still there making the water Steam. Also, Lightning is a sub-element of Fire, and is naturally not as destructive. And of course, our beloved Poison. Deadly stuff. I/L's only defense against this would be to make an Ice Wall, but that can be melted by fire. |
My Characters: destinytwig2 - 100 Windia Dragon Knight
gamerdude292 08/07/10
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
 | [quote] Grimmjow44 : so...ur saying AM's in general r going to be better than wat the chart says? [/quote] I'm saying every class was buffed, and we have no clue where the tiers stand at the moment. |
My Characters: FrozNlite - 200 Khaini F/P Arch Mage
hermitcraps 08/07/10
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| im pretty sure i/l get to hit twice with their mobbing skill in their second job does that make it better than FA |
My Characters: Vulune - 47 Broa F/P Wizard
pancakes030 08/07/10
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| [quote] cookie4mesos : Pancakes wins the thread. [/quote] i agree . c: |
My Characters: squishy030 - 95 Scania F/P Mage
IImaplers 08/09/10
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
 | [quote] pancakes030 : i agree . c: [/quote] I agree with that^ and I agree that pancakes wins the thread. |
My Characters: LoLLerBlade5 - 27 DemethosGMS Blade Recruit
pancakes030 08/09/10
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| i agree with everyone that says that i win this thread , who agrees with me . |
My Characters: squishy030 - 95 Scania F/P Mage
Emenia 08/09/10
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| I agree with your agreement :D |
My Characters: Kappah - 120 Windia Paladin
BasilMarket is Copyright 2004-2008 BasilMarket.com (archive reconstruction). Data recovered from the Internet Archive Wayback Machine for the Classic MapleStory community.