Lukless people, you have a chance.

basilmarket.com forums : Mage | 15 posts archived

thread starter Dracius Jul 19 2010 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

With the Big Bang, you only get SP resets, but with the new event (Check on the front page of Maple) you can get AP reset scrolls. Sure, it's probably only about 20 points at max, but it's still something.

My Characters: Draco8671 - 50 Khaini Evan 5th Growth

Purplefang94 07/19/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

If you're lukless, you're still screwed.

My Characters: Tiggleric - 71 Mardia Aran in Misery

Dracius 07/19/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

[quote] Purplefang94 : If you're lukless, you're still screwed. [/quote] 24 Base Luk...That's enough of a boost to provide some good accuracy with some decent equips.

My Characters: Draco8671 - 50 Khaini Evan 5th Growth

Chrozome 07/19/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

[quote] Dracius : 24 Base Luk...That's enough of a boost to provide some good accuracy with some decent equips. [/quote] The formula is un-confirmed to be 1.2x int+luk+equips

My Characters: LurkingEvan - 143 Windia Evan 9th Growth

Dracius 07/19/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

You power hungry people will probably turn this into a debate about Lukless vs. Luk. I sure hope I'm wrong.

My Characters: Draco8671 - 50 Khaini Evan 5th Growth

Chrozome 07/19/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

[quote] Dracius : You power hungry people will probably turn this into a debate about Lukless vs. Luk. I sure hope I'm wrong. [/quote] Uh, i was just stating the formula.

My Characters: LurkingEvan - 143 Windia Evan 9th Growth

Ninety1 07/19/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

that's not bad for me i have 26 luk from equips 50 luk should be enough to hit monsters, i hope

My Characters: HowUnluky - 120 Bellocan I/L Arch Mage

Chrozome + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

[quote] Ninety1 : that's not bad for me i have 26 luk from equips 50 luk should be enough to hit monsters, i hope [/quote] You're wearings a MON? and don't worry, int takes more in effect than luk :

My Characters: LurkingEvan - 143 Windia Evan 9th Growth

z3ro429 07/19/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

what should mages cap their luk at? is 63 fine o.0

My Characters: DarkMage429 - 140 Broa I/L Arch Mage

monty007 07/19/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

The revamp is too much to handle for me as a mage.. So im going to quit it. This decision may or may not change. But after revamp it looks like im going to make a DK. Think about it. All the stress the high level lukless people have to go through. And right now I'm thinking about the funds I would need for those crazy luk equips to get me the Lv 164 staff and then how much money would be needed to just buy it. And worrying about being called weak till 164, honestly some of the jerks that play are really bad..

My Characters: RockYourWand - 131 Khaini F/P Arch Mage

Ninety1 07/20/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

[quote] Chrozome : You're wearings a MON? and don't worry, int takes more in effect than luk : [/quote] no, too lazy to buy one

My Characters: HowUnluky - 120 Bellocan I/L Arch Mage

DragonzSage 07/20/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

On my mage I just got the lukless elemental wands so I will drop my luk low enough to just wear my current equips

My Characters: lcyRevenge - 51 Galicia Aran in Memory

Ninety1 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

[quote] monty007 : The revamp is too much to handle for me as a mage.. So im going to quit it. This decision may or may not change. But after revamp it looks like im going to make a DK. Think about it. All the stress the high level lukless people have to go through. And right now I'm thinking about the funds I would need for those crazy luk equips to get me the Lv 164 staff and then how much money would be needed to just buy it. And worrying about being called weak till 164, honestly some of the jerks that play are really bad.. [/quote] lol, you gave me a great reason to not go back to ms i already stopped playing, why come back for 20 more luk my character's screwed either way since m.atk>int and starting a new character takes a lot of time

My Characters: HowUnluky - 120 Bellocan I/L Arch Mage

thecitadel 07/20/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

I can easily have 23 base luk now, while achieving 999 int, in time of course f2

My Characters: thecitadel - 120 KradiaGMS Bishop

JustBlazeddd + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

still going on about the accuracy formula when it's the damage one that bends you over ~_~ btw if they're trying to equalize the formulas (lame IMO) and make luk as useful for spell accuracy as dex is for weapon accuracy I'm pretty sure 20 luk won't be enough for some people.

My Characters: Clybaltt - 77 Windia I/L Mage