Lukless not entirely skrewed?

basilmarket.com forums : Mage | 15 posts archived

thread starter KingKaKnight Jul 04 2010 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Well just like dexless warriors and similar to them, can't mages wear luk and accuracy equips for accuracy? and does acc. affect mages after the big bang or not? If so major inflation...

My Characters: SanctifySin - 99 Khaini Priest

Nashinro 07/04/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

yes, i believe mages can wear luk equips to gain more acc

My Characters: Nashinro - 120 Windia F/P Arch Mage

Mclena 07/04/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Yeah, they'll be able to, but most likely won't be able to afford it though.

My Characters: MclenaofAran - 74 Windia Aran in Misery

iSKiLLiN 07/04/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

[quote] Mclena : Yeah, they'll be able to, but most likely won't be able to afford it though. [/quote] He's right. Most of us won't be able to afford luk-scrolled overalls, gloves, shoes, etc.

My Characters: xIntersecks - 33 Windia F/P Wizard

Xylit 07/04/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Ye but lukless is already weaker than low luk after revamp, being lukless with luk gear will make you EVEN weaker. xD

My Characters: AzureStar - 176 KradiaEMS Bishop

MorbidMagus 07/04/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Might as well do a low-luck base of 23-3x and use the potential system to get any luck you need for equipment, along with getting more int bonuses. Luckless is still possible, but it will fail compared to low luck builds.

My Characters: SvadiIfari - 168 DemethosGMS Evan 1st Growth

kratos7777 07/04/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

[quote] Xylit : Ye but lukless is already weaker than low luk after revamp, being lukless with luk gear will make you EVEN weaker. xD [/quote] If it's not enough LUK to equip some decent INT stuff then yes lol.

My Characters: Timovisch - 81 Broa Ranger

Yaaarghly 07/04/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

As long as bishops can use 120 reverse wands/ staffs, and ams can use their lv 163 staffs; low luk will always be best because magic att is almost equal to att O_o

My Characters: MikeTheCrueI - 25 Broa Warrior

yummricex 07/04/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

[quote] Xylit : Ye but lukless is already weaker than low luk after revamp, being lukless with luk gear will make you EVEN weaker. xD [/quote] lukless can only be weaker if lowluk has more funding.

My Characters: NiHaoHeal - 108 Scania Priest

Xylit 07/04/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

[quote] yummricex : lukless can only be weaker if lowluk has more funding. [/quote] I love how misinformed people are. Reverse aeas > Maple wisdom staff BIG time after revamp. Why? M.att works like attack.

My Characters: AzureStar - 176 KradiaEMS Bishop

shosen123 07/04/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

[quote] Xylit : I love how misinformed people are. Reverse aeas > Maple wisdom staff BIG time after revamp. Why? M.att works like attack. [/quote] ele wand>Reverse aeas

My Characters: shin0ken - 55 Scania Gunslinger

Xylit + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

[quote] shosen123 : ele wand>Reverse aeas [/quote] Not for a bishop, for AMs yes. And i didnt say e-wand was worse, did i? And to continue it, e-staff>e-wand.

My Characters: AzureStar - 176 KradiaEMS Bishop

ClricSakura 07/04/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

[quote] Xylit : Not for a bishop, for AMs yes. And i didnt say e-wand was worse, did i? And to continue it, e-staff>e-wand. [/quote] I can't wait to get my E-Staff 7 <3 OT: That's why I'm buying a LUK shield now I'm gonna need it anyway when I reach 163.

My Characters: xFrznSakurax - 133 Windia I/L Arch Mage

PreludeMage 07/04/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

[quote] Xylit : And to continue it, e-staff>e-wand. [/quote] That also goes for rarity.

My Characters: SolunaKitty - 191 Khaini I/L Arch Mage

scorp989 07/04/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Acc equips can save you.

My Characters: IcexScorpio - 123 Scania Aran in Hope