Luckless bishops still worth it?

basilmarket.com forums : Mage | 15 posts archived

thread starter bellobox Aug 22 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Seeing as 52 stat HT's are going to be resetted ...... No More DDS T_T Luckless mages will have lots more disadvantages but are luckless still stronger? EDIT : Remember, no ele wands either.

UltimaStarzz 08/22/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Wouldn't know, sorry, I thought it'd be more fun as a reg. LUK, and hey, it is (to me).

senyu 08/22/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Lukless is always stronger with same funds. But I really don't think a class is "worth it" if it wont make that much damage anymore. A class is worth it if you enjoy playing it. No matter if it's statless or not.

CiericJosh 08/22/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

not really your ele wands got owned with the 35% or was it 25 % reduction when using holy spells so i dnt knw i think i'l is better

Cliffan 08/22/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Actually, low luk have been proven to be stronger. Trust me. Get as much luk from your equips as you can, and add the rest and equip a DDS. You won't regret it.

Gamesta64 08/22/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

What's a DDS?

AltairHawk Aug 22 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Gamesta64 : What's a DDS? D ooms D ay S taff Your welcome. =P

jassi1 08/22/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

I'm Lukless 138 Bish with the most average equips (Nothing Godly really), and I pwn all the other Bish's. I can do allready about 55-60k damage on Skeles with a garbage Shine Wand. Though the luk-clothes do look sexy.

icemage07 08/22/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

now that the HT glitch is fixed, low luk bishops have a slight advantage over lukless bishops (unless they release a higher lv lukless weapon)

PreludeMage 08/22/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

I have 54 luk as a lukless (no glasses or rings), which means I'd need to add 26 luk to wield a DDS. 118 > 80 (Maple weapon) + 26. So low luk have around a 12 m. atk advantage. But then again, I have a 10 luk shield... so... take that out that makes it a 2 m.atk advantage. If you dont aim to get the quest medal, that takes off 2 more... That makes low luk and lukless equal (assuming no medal, no glasses, no luk shield). However, because of the luk equips you will be able to wear (the lv70 ones) and with maker (if lv70s get two gem slots... otherwise... ignore this part), low luk will be sliiightly more powerful, although much, much more expensive to fund.

jhkplaya888 08/22/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

WAIT the 52 stat ht necklaces are resetted? or you cant glitch no more? So if i buy one will it remain 52 stat?

icemage07 08/22/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

all the 52 stat pendant will be reset to 22 source

Inferno 08/22/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Lucky I didn't get one. :o Was thinking bout it yesterday. Was one for 650m. :O

N2H20 08/22/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

With the new nerfing of the E. Wands. Lukless bishops are now just slightly less powerful than Low Luk bishops. Lukless Mage: Total M.atk = 150 m.atk from equips + 29 INT from unused LUK = 179 150 m. atk from equips 29 INT from unused LUK 4 Luk Base 40 Luk from equips Wisdom Staff (+1 INT, 80 m.atk) Z Helm (+15 INT, 15 LUK) Dark Starlight (+4 INT) Yellow Snow Shoe (+3 INT) Flamekeeper Cordon (+8 m. atk) Maple Magician Shield (+2 INT) PuAC (+7 m. atk) Gold Emeral Earrings ( +5 INT) HT Pend (+22 INT, 22 LUK) Broken Glasses (+1 INT, 1 LUK) Quest Specialist Medal (+2 INT, 2 LUK) Low Luk Mage: Total M.atk = 197 197 m. atk from equips 33 Luk Base 49 Luk from equips DDS (118 m. atk) Z Helm (+15 INT, 15 LUK) Dark Requiem � Advanced Wisdom & Luk crystal (+10 INT, 7 LUK) Gold Lapiz Sandals � Advanced Wisdom crystal (+8 INT, 1 m. atk, 1 LUK) Dark Lorin � Advanced Wisdom crystal (+9 INT, 1 LUK) Maple Magician Shield (+2 INT) PuAC (+7 m. atk) Gold Emeral Earrings ( +5 INT) HT Pend (+22 INT, 22 LUK) Broken Glasses (+1 INT, 1 LUK) Quest Specialist Medal (+2 INT, 2 LUK)

ohsheet1234 Aug 22 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

N2H20 : With the new nerfing of the E. Wands. Lukless bishops are now just slightly less powerful than Low Luk bishops. Lukless Mage: Total M.atk = 150 m.atk from equips + 29 INT from unused LUK = 179 150 m. atk from equips 29 INT from unused LUK 4 Luk Base 40 Luk from equips Wisdom Staff (+1 INT, 80 m.atk) Z Helm (+15 INT, 15 LUK) Dark Starlight (+4 INT) Yellow Snow Shoe (+3 INT) Flamekeeper Cordon (+8 m. atk) Maple Magician Shield (+2 INT) PuAC (+7 m. atk) Gold Emeral Earrings ( +5 INT) HT Pend (+22 INT, 22 LUK) Broken Glasses (+1 INT, 1 LUK) Quest Specialist Medal (+2 INT, 2 LUK) Low Luk Mage: Total M.atk = 197 197 m. atk from equips 33 Luk Base 49 Luk from equips DDS (118 m. atk) Z Helm (+15 INT, 15 LUK) Dark Requiem � Advanced Wisdom & Luk crystal (+10 INT, 7 LUK) Gold Lapiz Sandals � Advanced Wisdom crystal (+8 INT, 1 m. atk, 1 LUK) Dark Lorin � Advanced Wisdom crystal (+9 INT, 1 LUK) Maple Magician Shield (+2 INT) PuAC (+7 m. atk) Gold Emeral Earrings ( +5 INT) HT Pend (+22 INT, 22 LUK) Broken Glasses (+1 INT, 1 LUK) Quest Specialist Medal (+2 INT, 2 LUK) How is this a fair comparison? Your low luk has more funding then the lukless...a clean dds is alot more expensive than a clean wisdom staff, and seeing how that's the main source of their magic attack ya...