Mages and Accuracy?

basilmarket.com forums : Mage | 15 posts archived

thread starter shaddow55 Aug 15 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Okay so how do you actually know how much accuracy a mage has, im sure its no dif but for a priest. The normal accuracy stat that applies to other classes, i think is BS since a mage with like 72 accuracy cannot hit horntail, yet they still do... So what else factors in for their accuracy or tells us what it is. Thanks

bellobox 08/15/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

We have our own Accuracy calculator... These threads are everywhere try find em!

yumtoast154 08/15/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Mages don't really "use" that accuracy.

blargggg Aug 15 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

I believe every 10 int = 1 "magic accuracy" same goes for luk, but I'm not sure. I use this to find out what I need to know, if you play with the numbers abit, it looks as what I said above is correct.

xofantasia 08/15/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Yeah we don't use that accuracy like the others said. For example, my damage doesn't get affected when I am hit by Harps (monsters that lowers accuracy).

gandalf0213 08/15/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

blargggg : I believe every 10 int = 1 "magic accuracy" same goes for luk, but I'm not sure. I use this to find out what I need to know, if you play with the numbers abit, it looks as what I said above is correct. Wrong. It's impossible to know how much INT = 1 M. Acc due to the formula having too many variables. @TS: We use Magic Accuracy, also known as M. Acc, here is an interesting experiment on it (also read pages 3 ~ 6 posts). You can also find the formula there. Also, nekonecat's calculator is good, but it's off by a bit.

blargggg Aug 15 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

gandalf0213 : Wrong. It's impossible to know how much INT = 1 M. Acc due to the formula having too many variables. @TS: We use Magic Accuracy, also known as M. Acc, here is an interesting experiment on it (also read pages 3 ~ 6 posts). You can also find the formula there. Also, nekonecat's calculator is good, but it's off by a bit. I never said that I was 100% SURE about my statments being correct or not. blargggg : I believe every 10 int = 1 "magic accuracy" same goes for luk, but I'm not sure. I use this to find out what I need to know, if you play with the numbers abit, it looks as what I said above is correct. PLEASE, learn to read before you post

Tsukasa 08/15/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Accuracy stat on its own counts for physical attacks. 72 Accuracy means you can't smack HT with your staff/wand. idk how to calculate Magic Accuracy though.

BBD 08/15/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

1 INT = 1 Magic 1 INT = 1 M.Def 1 INT = 1 Magic Acc.

Pyrolakitu 08/15/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Tsukasa : 72 Accuracy means you can't smack HT with your staff/wand. Exactly.

OnAir Aug 15 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Edit............

kirbyhyper 08/15/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

blargggg : I never said that I was 100% SURE about my statments being correct or not. PLEASE, learn to read before you post What you believe is wrong, so that's why he said you are wrong. Or at least to him you are. Looking at the magic accuracy formula, the only time INT and LUK actually play a factor is at the beginning, which mentions trunc(INT/10) + trunc(LUK/10). Therefore, 10 INT adds some amount of magic accuracy (as well as 10 LUK); it is just unsure as to whether or not it adds one accuracy as a whole.

eswarrr Aug 15 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

BBD : 1 INT = 1 Magic 1 INT = 1 M.Def 1 INT =/= 1 Magic Acc. Fixed it for you! kirbyhyper : What you believe is wrong, so that's why he said you are wrong. Or at least to him you are. Looking at the magic accuracy formula, the only time INT and LUK actually play a factor is at the beginning, which mentions trunc(INT/10) + trunc(LUK/10). Therefore, 10 INT adds some amount of magic accuracy (as well as 10 LUK); it is just unsure as to whether or not it adds one accuracy as a whole. Well 10 int = 1 m.accuracy is technically right. The Magical Accuracy formula according to Thikket and Nekoncat from sleepywood is Trunc(int/10)+Trunc(luk/10) if for instance we consider ones int is 10 and luk is 4 then by formula the persons magical accuracy will be =Trunc(10/10)+trunc(4/10) =1. So 10 int adds 1 magical accuracy is correct. Use the calculator and plug in values to see this yourself 10 int and 10 luk adds 2 m.acc, 20 int and 10 luk adds 3 m.acc so on and so forth.

THINGv1 08/15/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

eswarrr : Fixed it for you! Well 10 int = 1 m.accuracy is technically right. The Magical Accuracy formula according to Thikket and Nekoncat from sleepywood is Trunc(int/10)+Trunc(luk/10) if for instance we consider ones int is 10 and luk is 4 then by formula the persons magical accuracy will be =Trunc(10/10)+trunc(4/10) =1. So 10 int adds 1 magical accuracy is correct. Use the calculator and plug in values to see this yourself 10 int and 10 luk adds 2 m.acc, 20 int and 10 luk adds 3 m.acc so on and so forth. great explanation. I also think it's worth mentioning that darkness doesn't affect mages at all because it affects Physical Acc., and we use m.acc.

eswarrr 08/15/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

THINGv1 : great explanation. I also think it's worth mentioning that darkness doesn't affect mages at all because it affects Physical Acc., and we use m.acc. Well, I wrote a whole guide on this subject a month back. But it died. Yes, State of darkness has no effect on a magicians accuracy.