Should I stay Lukless?
basilmarket.com forums :
Mage
| 15 posts archived
thread starter DaSmexy Aug 09 2009
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| Hi everyone! Yesterday I turned Cleric.. and I am lukless, I thought I had amazing damage at the time, and I still do, But I don't really have the funds to get any INT overalls, earrings, anything prettymuch... Also, The reverse/timeless items look and are pretty awesome :D I just don't know if I want to stay lukless, or go regluk.. Also, I really don't want to go lowluk... so it's either one or the other. Thank you! :D |
Alleria 08/09/09
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
Fluoah 08/09/09
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| People keep thinking it costs tons of money to go luckless for some reason. If you can't afford good luckless stuff, you probably can't afford good luck stuff either. Wear whatever you can, much of your damage comes from the extra int you add. If you want decent equips that can tide you over, do the agent quests while you still can. |
DeMoNiAk 08/09/09
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| You don't need good lukless equips in order to have decent damage compared to regular luk mages. Since you are not funded, reverse weapons are out of question. Thus, staying lukless should be your best bet. |
xoxgodmodxox 08/09/09
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| just wana clear tjhis up there is no point to lukless scince ewands are nerfed and reverse are Great u will do more dmg with 123luk then with 4 because if this fact |
SlyOne 08/09/09
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| xoxgodmodxox : just wana clear tjhis up there is no point to lukless scince ewands are nerfed and reverse are Great u will do more dmg with 123luk then with 4 because if this fact Wrong. With this you will spend millions and billions of dollars whereas a Lukless wouldn't need as much funds in order to do more or a comparable amount of damage. Read tugboats thread was it? |
Y0u19 08/09/09
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| Wht would be stronger lv 120 lukless bishop with godly 64 wep or normal luk reverse wep bishop(lv 120) |
xcrashxx 08/09/09
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| A bishop with a decently scrolled reverse weapon |
xoxgodmodxox 08/09/09
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| okay what ever you will see my friend s a 184 lukless bishop with godly and mean godly equips like 34 int zhelm 20+ stat gloves i dont know exactly but i do know that with ewand on skeles he hit 107k ( one shot) now back with his old godly maple llama i think its 102 stat he hits 75k his ewand now hits 53k a reverse weapon is an un nerfed ewand too bad he is lukless or he would be hitting 100k+ again |
SourDonut 08/09/09
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| xoxgodmodxox : okay what ever you will see my friend s a 184 lukless bishop with godly and mean godly equips like 34 int zhelm 20+ stat gloves i dont know exactly but i do know that with ewand on skeles he hit 107k ( one shot) now back with his old godly maple llama i think its 102 stat he hits 75k his ewand now hits 53k a reverse weapon is an un nerfed ewand too bad he is lukless or he would be hitting 100k+ again I highly doubt your "friend"'s weapon lets him hit 32k more. You should at least calculate it to back you up before posting stupid ideas. Even shine wand bishops own reverse bishops, because of the fact that 1 INT=1 m.atk. Not to mention the TS isn't even funded so obviously lukless will be better for him. |
gameripper Aug 09 2009
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| SourDonut : I highly doubt your "friend"'s weapon lets him hit 32k more. You should at least calculate it to back you up before posting stupid ideas. Even shine wand bishops own reverse bishops, because of the fact that 1 INT=1 m.atk. Not to mention the TS isn't even funded so obviously lukless will be better for him. How so? +52 HT 15zhelm 50 base luk 6 luk from mw/ equip scrolled for int Luckless staff=80m.atk low-luk= 140m.atk 80(luckless staff)+50 (from luckless)= 130m.atk 140m.atk=/=130(lukless) low-luk>lukless BISHOPS |
tugboats Aug 09 2009
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| xoxgodmodxox : okay what ever you will see my friend s a 184 lukless bishop with godly and mean godly equips like 34 int zhelm 20+ stat gloves i dont know exactly but i do know that with ewand on skeles he hit 107k ( one shot) now back with his old godly maple llama i think its 102 stat he hits 75k his ewand now hits 53k a reverse weapon is an un nerfed ewand too bad he is lukless or he would be hitting 100k+ again lv 130 wand = 145 m.atk - 0luk requirement = 145 stat weapon reverse wand = 140 m.atk/5int - 123 luk = 22 stat weapon 145 > 22 btw 107k at lv 18x sucks gameripper : How so? +52 HT 15zhelm 50 base luk 6 luk from mw/ equip scrolled for int Luckless staff=80m.atk low-luk= 140m.atk 80(luckless staff)+50 (from luckless)= 130m.atk 140m.atk=/=130(lukless) low-luk>lukless BISHOPS 1. +52 HT pendant is a GLITCH, and may possibly be fixed by Nexon. 2. Compare price of wisdom staff VS reverse staff? 3. You are completely wrong; lukless can wear blade staves with glitched pendants. 118m.atk clean blade staff + 50 = 168 168 > 140 |
Inferno 08/10/09
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| I love it when tugboats comes in. Always starts a fight. :O |
volcanocube 08/10/09
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| I started this character unfunded and I scrolled every item myself After almost a year I have a 19 int robe, 15 int YAC and so on, I just kept saving up for the next scroll. OT: Lukless is alot cheaper and stronger. Stay lukless like everyone else above says |
xenavion Aug 10 2009
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| tugboats : 1. +52 HT pendant is a GLITCH, and may possibly be fixed by Nexon. 2. Compare price of wisdom staff VS reverse staff? 140 since when its glitched in kms they r repeatable to get the eggs, nexon just do this way for $$$ |
BasilMarket is Copyright 2004-2008 BasilMarket.com (archive reconstruction). Data recovered from the Internet Archive Wayback Machine for the Classic MapleStory community.
