Does FA work only with Power Strike

basilmarket.com forums : Cygnus Knight | 15 posts archived

thread starter HyperRyan Aug 04 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

As the title says

liyanggu 08/04/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

DW's FA works with PS, SB, and brandish.

HyperRyan 08/04/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Whats Brandish this is my first warrior so im not good with terms of skills

wenbodou Aug 04 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

liyanggu said: "DW's FA works with PS, SB, and brandish." what are you smoking lol why would final attack work with a 4th job skill slash blast and power strike sir *edit* i retract my statement and apologize for not knowing that SOUL WARRIORS MAKE NO SENSE WHATSOEVER AM I AM NOW HAPPY THAT I MADE A WIND ARCHER INSTEAD

kirayamato26 08/04/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

wenbodou said: " what are you smoking lol why would final attack work with a 4th job skill slash blast and power strike sir *edit* i retract my statement and apologize for not knowing that SOUL WARRIORS MAKE NO SENSE WHATSOEVER AM I AM NOW HAPPY THAT I MADE A WIND ARCHER INSTEAD" FA is Supportive, you can turn it on or off, therefore, it doesn't impair Brandish's DPM. The reason why it is supportive is probably because Dawn Warriors have so little skills that they MUST have at least level 1 FA, regardless of other skills. And like the first poster said, it doesn't just work with Power Strike.

warriorlife 08/04/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

What about Wind archer's FA?

kirayamato26 Aug 04 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

warriorlife said: "What about Wind archer's FA?" Same thing as the Dawn Warrior's, it's supportive. Edit: And it only works with DS.

wenbodou 08/04/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

i was aware it was supportive...but the fact that it actually works on brandish...is just...hilarious lolololololol man, silly cygnus warriors, weird brandish + no stance sounds rather unappealing haha

Takeback3r Aug 04 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

wenbodou said: "i was aware it was supportive...but the fact that it actually works on brandish...is just...hilarious lolololololol man, silly cygnus warriors, weird brandish + no stance sounds rather unappealing haha" Unappealing until it out damages wind archers and NWs. >.>

wenbodou 08/04/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

pfft, who wants a stanceless warrior when i already have one with stance ~_~ not me fo' sho' :D

Takeback3r Aug 04 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

wenbodou said: "pfft, who wants a stanceless warrior when i already have one with stance ~_~ not me fo' sho' :D" Because stance is totally the most important thing ever, lol.

MrAero 08/04/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Takeback3r said: " Because stance is totally the most important thing ever, lol." You sound sarcastic... Or you're just dumb.

wenbodou 08/04/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

you talk like someone who hasn't played with stance :P it's really important if you're melee attacking zak arms, do you realize how annoying it is having to climb back up every time you get hit?

liyanggu 08/04/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Takeback3r 08/04/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

MrAero said: " You sound sarcastic... Or you're just dumb." I am sarcastic. wenbodou said: "you talk like someone who hasn't played with stance :P it's really important if you're melee attacking zak arms, do you realize how annoying it is having to climb back up every time you get hit?" My main is a bucc. Energy charge has 50% stance effect. I also zak 3 times a week. I don't need stance on a DW considering i won't boss seriously ...like ever.