Wouldn't lukless be better with 20 LUK?

basilmarket.com forums : Mage | 14 posts archived

thread starter Phera Jul 02 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

I believe that Lukless will be better with 20 base LUK because when you die with 20 base LUK you only lose 5% instead of 10% therefore making you train faster, unless of course you don't die 0.o. I'm sure everybody has died in training at least once. Also, at lvl 200 every lukless will have 23 base LUK so in the long run (saying you get to lvl 200 lol), it wouldn't make a difference, not that it makes much of a difference anyways. EDIT: @belows lol as a new member i am limited to posting lol... sorry i can't reply lol

Sn1per 07/02/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

wrong, my BM has a total of 32 LUK, and i lose just over 5.5% when i die.

Inferno 07/02/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Pros don't die.

DosE Jul 02 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

4 Base luk + 15 z-helm luk + 22 HT pend luk = 41 So they can still be lukless.

MyLiquidSnake 07/02/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

EXP lost by dying is determined by CLASS/JOB and BASE LUK, not LUK added from equips.

KaRnAgE926 07/02/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Phera said: "I believe that Lukless will be better with 20 base LUK because when you die with 20 base LUK you only lose 5% instead of 10% therefore making you train faster, unless of course you don't die 0.o. I'm sure everybody has died in training at least once. Also, at lvl 200 every lukless will have 23 base LUK so in the long run (saying you get to lvl 200 lol), it wouldn't make a difference, not that it makes much of a difference anyways." at lvl 200 with 4 base luk i will have 19 extra AP that i will add towards my MP instead, and i always carry safety charms =]

xTurtally 07/02/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

KaRnAgE926 said: "at lvl 200 with 4 base luk i will have 19 extra AP that i will add towards my MP instead, and i always carry safety charms =]" I would put them into Str for fun. :D Or Hp.

iDmge 07/02/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

DosE said: "4 Base luk + 15 z-helm luk + 22 HT pend luk = 41 So they can still be lukless." It's base luk -.- I heard it got changed, instead of the amount of luk it is now about the class.

Sujinpuffy 07/02/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

20 base LUK wouldn't make them LUKless, just low-LUK. Unless I'm missing something here.

stevking99 07/02/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

i prefer 50 luk for better weapons

Rhettly 07/04/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

luk is good it makes your avg better^^ i use too hit 300~1800 before i got equips with luk like a dep star

eagleharbor 07/04/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

if ur pro who cares? i die alot but me being so strong without this 20uk allows me to make up for lost time in a matter of 10-20mins.

papataytay 07/04/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

You wouldn't be luckless then.

Phera 07/04/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

eagleharbor said: "if ur pro who cares? i die alot but me being so strong without this 20uk allows me to make up for lost time in a matter of 10-20mins." 16 more magic att can't make it up that fast.... Its barely anything