Lukless F/P Mage or Normal luk?

basilmarket.com forums : Mage | 15 posts archived

thread starter Shaway Jun 15 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Hey guys im thinking about making a F/P Mage to see what their like. Should i go Lukless or Normal luk Whats the pros and cons of both and are F/P good for soloing bosses and etc? Thanks!

Hatorade 06/15/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Lukless. If you go PB build, you'll be able to hit DT's and MDT's much earlier, allowing for faster training.

HendrixPhoenix 06/15/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

hmm do you have funding cause even 100k is good enough to make a decent lukless

Shaway 06/15/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

i kind of have good funding.

azel088 06/15/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Meh Just go lukless. Not like you need 384738743bil to make a good one

eswarrr 06/15/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Go lukless. But with PB and at such low level(typically 55) your accuracy at DT's will be much less than a normal luk mage. So as soon as you hit 50 you might need to get zhelm and silver dep star. If you can afford it, Lukless is much worth it. F/Ps are the most expensive luk/lukless. For the pros and cons, check the stickies.

Hatorade 06/17/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

eswarrr said: "Go lukless. But with PB and at such low level(typically 55) your accuracy at DT's will be much less than a normal luk mage. So as soon as you hit 50 you might need to get zhelm and silver dep star. If you can afford it, Lukless is much worth it. F/Ps are the most expensive luk/lukless. For the pros and cons, check the stickies." Actually his accuracy at DT's will be much higher than a normal luk mage at the same level.

eagleharbor 06/17/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Hatorade said: " Actually his accuracy at DT's will be much higher than a normal luk mage at the same level." Yep, i remember i 100% hit himes at like 7x and i saw priest nearly 90 who couldn't.

Aznguy999 06/17/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

eagleharbor said: " Yep, i remember i 100% hit himes at like 7x and i saw priest nearly 90 who couldn't." Did you really? O.O How? Godly equips + ZHelm?

eswarrr Jun 17 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Hatorade said: " Actually his accuracy at DT's will be much higher than a normal luk mage at the same level." I dont know if you are ever gonna read my reply again, but luk is the key factor in determining the magical accuracy when the level difference between you and the monster is way higher. So at lvl 55(normal level where normal luks go to DTs) normal luk will definitely have more magical accuracy. As you level, the level difference gets shorter and INT effects the most. eagleharbor said: "Yep, i remember i 100% hit himes at like 7x and i saw priest nearly 90 who couldn't. " I dont believe you, wanna know the reason? At 7X's the level difference is 20+ and let me put you at level 79 and you have a zhelm and silver dep star that adds 20 luk above 4 base luk. At Level 79, with 24 total luk one needs 620 Int to 100% hit them. Even with the best equips one couldnt achieve more than 550 int. On the other hand I am 100% positive that a lvl 90 normal luk priest can hit 100% or atleast 99% of the times.

TreeHuggers 06/17/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Hatorade said: " Actually his accuracy at DT's will be much higher than a normal luk mage at the same level." You are wrong. Luck mages will have more acc because they have more int + luck total. I was luckless and my acc wasn't "much higher" than my cousin. I logged on his i/l myself to confirm.

gandalf0213 Jun 17 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Hatorade said: "Lukless. If you go PB build, you'll be able to hit DT's and MDT's much earlier, allowing for faster training." False. Hatorade said: " Actually his accuracy at DT's will be much higher than a normal luk mage at the same level." Both, Luk and Int give the same amount of M. Acc, when will you people learn -_-. You are wrong. Luck mages will have more acc because they have more int + luck total. I was luckless and my acc wasn't "much higher" than my cousin. I logged on his i/l myself to confirm.

eswarrr Jun 17 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

gandalf0213 said: " Both, Luk and Int give the same amount of M. Acc, when will you people learn -_-." It's a very common misconception among non-mage characters to think pure INT gives more accuracy.

gandalf0213 06/17/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

eswarrr said: "It's a very common misconception among non-mage characters to think pure INT gives more accuracy." For non-mages? Dude the mage forum is a joke, even mages don't know about their own class x_x.

TreeHuggers Jun 17 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

gandalf..gandalf...gandalf..... when will you ever learn.... Luck mages have more access to total Int and Luck equips not base. For example they can use overralls that add more int/luck than a bathrobe. Take two equal funded mages and the luck one will always have more acc or equal because of this. Luckless with never have more than normal luck.