How do you make lukless after big bang?
basilmarket.com forums : Big Bang  |  11 posts archived
« prev list next » thread 263 of 389  (arrow keys work)
thread starter rukirio9 Sep 28 2010 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
a lot of people say after big bang you will need luk for accuracy, so does that mean you need to get luk equips instead of int?
My Characters: x01aran - 84 Scania Aran in Misery
furyofdragns 09/28/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
you go regular derp.
My Characters: furyofdragns - 129 Broa Dark Knight
rukirio9 09/28/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
[quote] furyofdragns : you go regular derp. [/quote] yeah but potential equips are costly so i think going lukless is better
My Characters: x01aran - 84 Scania Aran in Misery
Abysseon 09/28/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
[quote] rukirio9 : a lot of people say after big bang you will need luk for accuracy, so does that mean you need to get luk equips instead of int? [/quote] You don't need luk for accuracy. -.-
My Characters: Abysseon - 133 Scania I/L Arch Mage
Flame42 09/28/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
[quote] rukirio9 : yeah but potential equips are costly so i think going lukless is better [/quote] Since when did you need potential equips to be regular luk?
My Characters: Flame927 - 86 Bera Evan 7th Growth
rukirio9 09/28/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
[quote] Flame42 : Since when did you need potential equips to be regular luk? [/quote] to have the same amount of luk a lukless will have
My Characters: x01aran - 84 Scania Aran in Misery
Flame42 09/28/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
[quote] rukirio9 : to have the same amount of luk a lukless will have [/quote] It's not that hard to get luk without potential equips.
My Characters: Flame927 - 86 Bera Evan 7th Growth
rukirio9 09/28/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
[quote] Flame42 : It's not that hard to get luk without potential equips. [/quote] sorry i meant int
My Characters: x01aran - 84 Scania Aran in Misery
Efemera 09/28/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
[quote] rukirio9 : yeah but potential equips are costly so i think going lukless is better [/quote] 3% int equips are cheap. Lukless fails.
My Characters: OcaLily - 150 Bera F/P Arch Mage
MagicUpChuck 09/28/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
just cap base luk at 80ish max. use a 165 staff, be a winner. (capping lower and rolling the lionheart set might also make you a winner pending the staffs attack speed rating)
My Characters: lmCharginLzr - 53 Bera Page
kirbyhyper 09/28/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
[quote] Abysseon : You don't need luk for accuracy. -.- [/quote] This. If it weren't for the level thing, a level 34 LUKless Magician would have enough accuracy to 100% hit monsters that are level 160. Low-LUK isn't replacing LUKless for accuracy related issues.
My Characters: AIlyssa - 134 KradiaGMS I/L Arch Mage
« prev list next » thread 263 of 389  (arrow keys work)