Do you think dropping the atomic bomb on the Japanese cities
basilmarket.com forums : Chat  |  16 posts archived
« prev list next » thread 5,573 of 15,600  (arrow keys work)
thread starter brofist Mar 09 2010 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
of Hiroshima and Nagasaki the right decision? Why or why not.
My Characters: Smash - 34 Scania Cleric
BurninDavyn 03/09/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
It's war. Nothing is justifiable, while at the same time, everything is.
My Characters: XO347 - 85 Broa Hermit
Belloman 03/09/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
Look up "Rape of Nanking" (I think that's how it's spelled) After you read about it you'll know why. I actually teared up watching a documentary about it.
My Characters: iisPokeman - 86 Bellocan Hermit
IBakeBabies 03/09/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
I think it was a good idea at the time, but then again it introduced the world to nuclear warfare. They saw the devastating power the A-Bomb had, and everyone instantly wanted a better one. Then again, I don't suppose it would have been too long before someone discovered it anyways. Although, there were many other ways to bomb those cities, the A-Bomb was just the most convenient (I think, correct me if I'm wrong). I personally don't agree with war in general, but that's just me. Unless we're fighting the Covenant (Halo anyone? :D)
My Characters: Teehee411 - 115 Bera Crusader
Macaroni 03/09/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
It's not possible to tell. Potentially the war could have gone on and more people would have died than in the explosions but potentially it could have been shorter or it would have been the same number of casualties but we wouldn't have killed as many civilians
My Characters: zachncheese - 52 Khaini Bandit
brofist 03/09/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
[quote] wordk41 : "Why or why not." makes it seem like homework :P [/quote] Do you want to hear my opinion, okay. I think it was most likely okay to do it since the Japanese took citizens and treated them like guinea pigs, molesting them, testing on them, and whatnot. Also they would not stop, even with the warning the president (Truman) did on that time about dropping the bomb if they continued and they did so they had no choice. Plus, the bomb just killed 200,000 citizens, comparing to the lives that the country would have lost if they sent their 1million troops to invade and control Japan. I was just curious what you people think, but it seems you can only relate stuff like this with homework.
My Characters: Smash - 34 Scania Cleric
phididdy111 03/09/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
[quote] wordk41 : "Why or why not." makes it seem like homework :P OT: I dunno , I don't really study history that much , nor do I remember much of what I learned from 8th grade social studies. :/ [/quote] Clever...
My Characters: SaigonLegend - 54 Scania Fighter
9876543210wh 03/09/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
They could have bombed some uninhabited region, possibly of the coast, first as a deterrent. If that didn't work then bomb cities, next to that it was probably the easiest way to end the war.
My Characters: hbformoney - 100 DemethosGMS Dragon Knight
Freeaznboy 03/09/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
[quote] timmybitty : They didn't have to drop on a city like I'm pretty sure if America dropped it somewhere near Japan and the Japanese people saw it that would of been enough to stop the war. [/quote] and waste the resources? what if the Japanese people thought it was an illusion or something, thing is it did the job intended by the president, ending the war. Also both bombs together only killed 120,000 people within a day and a few thousand died after from radiation and other causes, what would you rather have the Japanese continue fighting and killing us by the hundereds of thousands? or 120,000 people
My Characters: Sharp69 - 60 Bellocan Gunslinger
floetry + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
no. Japan was already on the verge of surrender. in fact, they were already planning to do so, but wouldn't because the US demanded complete and unconditional surrender and the Japanese see the emperor as somewhat divine, and refused to surrender if it meant they would have to give him up. one bomb was unjustifiable, and two bombs was beyond overkill. besides, they bombs were dropped against non military targets. the side of american history that they don't tell you.
My Characters: k41ser - 94 Bera Chief Bandit
iMrKie 03/09/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
[quote] timmybitty : They didn't have to drop on a city like I'm pretty sure if America dropped it somewhere near Japan and the Japanese people saw it that would of been enough to stop the war. [/quote] yeah but they didn't want to waste the nuke. if it didn't work out ... it'd be bad
My Characters: iMrKie - 66 Scania Fighter
Freeaznboy 03/09/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
[quote] floetry : no. Japan was already on the verge of surrender. in fact, they were already planning to do so, but wouldn't because the US demanded complete and unconditional surrender and the Japanese see the emperor as somewhat divine, and refused to surrender if it meant they would have to give him up. one bomb was unjustifiable, and two bombs was beyond overkill. besides, they bombs were dropped against non military targets. the side of american history that they don't tell you. [/quote] Hiroshima was a military target, bases and armories were there. Also its not just because of the military bases. Truman was looking for two cities which would cause the greatest impact and shock to the Japanese people. He wanted a city with a larger diameter than 3 miles, very urban, and wanted it where the after shock would make the Japanese immediatly surrender
My Characters: Sharp69 - 60 Bellocan Gunslinger
xultrashock 03/09/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
the us was also trying to bomb them with more traditional bombs with no surrender. They were losing resources and men. When they sent in the a-bomb they saved time, resources and men.
My Characters: XUltraThrow - 95 Bera Hermit
NapalmDe4th 03/09/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
[quote] Belloman : Look up "Rape of Nanking" (I think that's how it's spelled) After you read about it you'll know why. I actually teared up watching a documentary about it. [/quote] The U.S. did NOT drop the bombs because of Nanking.
My Characters: JoyDivision7 - 72 Scania White Knight
Cysero852 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
[quote] floetry : the side of american history that they don't tell you. [/quote] Actually, my U.S. history teacher made sure we knew this side. OT: My personal belief is that after deciding whether to invade Japan or drop the bombs, the bombs were dropped on targets that would cause devastation and make Japan lose the will to fight, seeing their comrades dead. Effective but gruesome method of winning. EDIT: Oops, freeaznboy ninja'd me.
My Characters: Cryak852 - 44 Broa Assassin
L1l4znfr34k 03/09/10 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
The second bomb was totally unnecessary, but I still do not think the Japanese deserved it. The Japanese citizens shouldn't take the fault of the government's wrongful action. Then again, what the hell do I know about history?
My Characters: EliteSatThu - 70 Scania Bandit
« prev list next » thread 5,573 of 15,600  (arrow keys work)