Dexless, worth it or not?
basilmarket.com forums : Warrior  |  15 posts archived
« prev list next » thread 892 of 1,741  (arrow keys work)
thread starter Xmagmarex Sep 03 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
I'm on the way to making a dexless hero, however, I don't have the mesos for the 1H sword + shield combo, so I will have to stick to a 2H sword. Is this worth it considering that I can't use a stonetooth? If no, should i just make a normal dex hero?
fpsmuch 09/03/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
If you can't fund a dexless hero, don't make one, make a regular dex it costs alot to be dexless as you need to buy acc/dex equips
Xmagmarex 09/03/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
I can fund the dex equips, just not the 1H sword and the shield.
iDmge 09/03/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
fpsmuch : If you can't fund a dexless hero, don't make one, make a regular dex it costs alot to be dexless as you need to buy acc/dex equips If you got the money to be dexless it doesn't mean you should be one. Buying acc equips and giving up att for them doesn't work.
fpsmuch 09/03/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
if you have the money to make a dexless, you would make one to make use of it what's the use of weapon att if you can't hit the monster without accuracy
Xmagmarex 09/03/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
iDmge : If you got the money to be dexless it doesn't mean you should be one. Buying acc equips and giving up att for them doesn't work. How would you be giving up attack? you'll be giving up strength... which you will more than make up for in your base stats. What I'm trying to say is... is a dexless hero still better than a normal hero if it uses 2H swords?
fpsmuch 09/03/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
it would be
taleko 09/03/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
Xmagmarex : is a dexless hero still better than a normal hero if it uses 2H swords? yes.
Xmagmarex 09/03/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
Then why is everyone voting no lol =O
SteelPreist 09/03/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
It's not worth it buddy. Why because Warriors need the dex to get there armor and the high def and attk is what warriors are known for. Also without Dex you won't have acc, which will really your game since Warriors have horrible acc as it is. To regain that dex will cost a lot of money.
abel1994 09/03/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
warrior dont neead dex they need accuacy lol im a 20 base dex so i wont miss alot of monster and im already got a z helm :D
quinnkeith13 09/03/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
SteelPreist : It's not worth it buddy. Why because Warriors need the dex to get there armor and the high def and attk is what warriors are known for. Also without Dex you won't have acc, which will really your game since Warriors have horrible acc as it is. To regain that dex will cost a lot of money. Since when did warrior armor need Dex? 0.o
Tsetsi1 09/03/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
well nowe zhelm cost afortune im going to do a Z run as soon i i can and hope to survive since the helms are over 100 mill before they were50
DanishDude1 09/03/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
If you can afford it easily then yes it is worth it. If you can't then it's better to go normal dex because you will just be spending all ur money on accuracy equips and not a good weapon, glove, etc. Any1 who says it's not worth it even with the money is either uneducated about warriors or jealous of dexless warriors.
CrazySeal 09/03/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
i was dexless with no money, now lv 102. just scroll overall with 100% dex, gloves with 100% acc, use a pig illustrated for weapon, ur set
« prev list next » thread 892 of 1,741  (arrow keys work)