What's more cost effective?

basilmarket.com forums : General Maple Story | 11 posts archived

thread starter amzngscrwonhead Sep 02 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

I have a sexy Winkle: +2 Dex, 70% knockback rate, and 7 slots left I would like to scroll to perfection. Putting luck aside, which method of reasoning do you think would be cost effective? Thanks for your time!

LukLessEMS 09/02/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

White Scrolling. Might be expensive, but you're 100% sure you'll have a perfect item.

Novelist 09/02/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Why scroll a winkle...?

t0ky0mike 09/02/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Why even bother scrolling a low leveld bow such as a winkle?

guitarfreak 09/02/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

t0ky0mike : Why even bother scrolling a low leveld bow such as a winkle? This

Stemachus 09/02/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Do you even have the money for this?

enoch129 09/02/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Scroll a reverse for crying out loud >:O

pledger 09/02/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

White scroll with every 10%? Lol? You do realize that only 1 in every 10 scrolls work. So essentially it could take you 10 times before you get 1 to work. But lets say for the sake of arguement you had every 1 in 4 10% scrolls work. Thats 28 scrolls it would take to get it +7. Now, thats 21 white scrolls? Am I right?

XxAritoxX 09/02/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Upon : Rofl, i don't even think that 1 in every 10 is always going to work. In a -ahem- I used about 100 white scrolls and 100 10% to scroll a perfect 7 slot bwg, so yea.. it all depends on luck. On which Pizza Slice?

amzngscrwonhead 09/02/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

t0ky0mike : Why even bother scrolling a low leveld bow such as a winkle? Just to have :D

pledger 09/02/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Upon, you can think whatever you want. But probability says that 1 in 10 will work. Thats why its 10%..... Now of coarse not every 1 in 10 is going to work. you could get 10 in 10 to work. Im saying that realistically the results you get SHOULD be 1 in 10.