dexless or normal?
thread starter Ghetto415 Aug 19 2009
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| my friends tink normal is beter den dexless :3 and i think dexless would be better :D but im ot sure. so wat do U guys think. tell me the reasons too :] (btw im reffering to a sin AND a dit so give reason for BOTH plz :]) EDIT: i fergot to add low dex :P which is around 90 dex |
ahhlax 08/19/09
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| dexless if you are funded or think you can earn money to fund youself. dexless is a whole lot stronger than normal |
NinjaSinDX 08/19/09
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| it kinda depends what ur last weapon is tho so if ur normal and u get a lvl 100 dagger u would beat a dexless that has a lvl 75 bandit since ur weapon has more attack and also their is a upside of moar accuracy |
runepl8user 08/19/09
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| dexless is better becuase your main attack for 110 levels depends on your luk |
houdinimage 08/19/09
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| Well funded dexless is better. Good dexless dits are HAWT. |
Ghetto415 08/19/09
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| lol well my friends said he perfers "low dex" which in his term means around 90dex. to me i tink 90 dex is a decent low dex area. nottoo high not too low |
xleahraex3 Aug 19 2009
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| I didn't vote because your poll options sounds like a retarded 7 year old got a hold of the internet. =] As far as damage goes, obviously dexless is stronger. But in my opinion regular stats are best, because you get to experience the full game play. Not limited by lack of stats. |
CluelessPost 08/19/09
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| Str Dits >> they get Khadars o.O. and petty much low dex for sins =S maybe 80 base dex ftw? |
Carrot 08/19/09
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| Sins = only if godly funded. Well, you should be able to make an even godlier lowdex one, really. Dits = STR win in the end. Sorry. |
qwan456 Aug 19 2009
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| DEXless Assassins provide the biggest bang for you buck. At lower level, they are the cheapest (yes, the cheapest) build there is, and contrary to the popular belief, you don't need a lot of funds to start it. Now if you going to compare yourselves to others, then that's a different story. But I'm talking about how you give two builds the same amount of funds, and the DEXless will make the most of it. Now since DEXless have an high amount of LUK already, they aren't require to get LUK equips. Those are just luxury items. The main thing they need to focus on is their ATT of their claw. Whereas a regDEX will not only need to focus on buying an claw, they would need to spend even more to make up for the difference in LUK, which cause them to be more expensive. LowDEX is just expensive. You need funds first before you can compete. xD DEXless can make it up to like level 130-140, before a lowDEX start pass them on equal average funds. It also been said that a regDEX will never outdamage a DEXless on equal funds as well, unless the DEXless just very poorly funded. Of course, the last part could be argue back in forth. If regDEX do outdamage them, it will be much later. Anyways, in the end, it really all come down to funds. Since most of the time everybody going to have different amount of funds, you will see DEXless beating lowDEX. RegDEX beating DEXless. In all honesty, when put in real life practice, it really doesn't matter who is better. In my eyes, they pretty much the same. Just choose whatever build that suits you and have fun with it. Edit: runepl8user : dexless is better becuase your main attack for 110 levels depends on your luk Actually, the formula is the same. Lucky Seven is Triple Throw with the extra star. You see the other builds catching up due to the fact that the LUK:W.ATT ratio is much higher for the DEXless. So they would need more LUK to equal 1 ATT. |
Ghetto415 08/19/09
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| wow o.o lol. well how much is a low dex? around 80? i hear alot of "lowdex" staying at 90 but im not realy sure o.o. and btw dis is just for curioustity. im just here to look at other ppls opinions. not to prove anything. |
qwan456 08/19/09
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| Ghetto415 : wow o.o lol. well how much is a low dex? around 80? i hear alot of "lowdex" staying at 90 but im not realy sure o.o. and btw dis is just for curioustity. im just here to look at other ppls opinions. not to prove anything. Oh, sorry. I was just providing what I know. xD But like I said, I treat them equally. There's pros and cons for all the builds. So I don't see one as better than the other. But if I have to pick, I like how you have to work on the lowDEX build. As you can planned and calculate the best way to spend your equips. It's more of an challenge, whereas the other builds you just buy LUK and ATT. Simple. xD As for what is consider lowDEX. Technically, if you used 1 DEX to wear you claw, you are a lowDEX. xD Of course, people will see it differently and have different definition for it. My definition of it was 70 DEX lower then the claw you going to wear. So if you going to wear a Sleve, your DEX is the max of 80. |
Ghetto415 08/19/09
+ PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
| lol wow o.o lotsa info there. lol. anyways tyvm. :] really helped. since my friend was decieding to either become a normal dex or stay dexless or be low dex. he decided to become a normal sin. as for the Dit part, i was just curious for my side :P |
BasilMarket is Copyright 2004-2008 BasilMarket.com (archive reconstruction). Data recovered from the Internet Archive Wayback Machine for the Classic MapleStory community.