Blaze Wizard : Lukless or normal luk

basilmarket.com forums : Cygnus Knight | 10 posts archived

thread starter Legendary777 Aug 14 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Well, I'm a lvl 41 BW. I'm currently lukless, but if normal luk is better, I can probably fix it within a couple levels. So, which one hits better in the end? I'm not exactly what you call funded, but I still can get by using agent equips. So again, which one hits better?

Dued142 08/14/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

X-less > Normal X no matter the funding. X may be luk or dex.

thecitadel 08/14/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Dued142 : X-less > Normal X no matter the funding. X may be luk or dex. Only really applies to mages. clerics especially.

JayFTW Aug 14 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

id rather have dex being honest >.> Im actually making a nw that has dex o.o im capping it at 110

llazar 08/14/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Lukless isnt better no matter wat the funding is...

SpiritDeath Aug 14 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Unless you can afford and scroll perfect int/luk equips, I'd rather go Luk than lukless. But my current Blaze Wiz is Low-luk. Everything's fine [:

megabob10 Aug 14 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

llazar : Lukless isnt better no matter wat the funding is... Yes it is. Luckless will beat the other builds if they all have equal funds. @above Go to the mage section and research a bit PLEASE.

MilkFTW 08/15/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

SpiritDeath : Unless you can afford and scroll perfect int/luk equips [: Uh...What... Lukless is cheaper than luk and stronger with clean equips becuase 1 int + 1 M.Atk lukless will always be stronger.

flynntendo64 08/15/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Uh. Lukless with a wooden wand will beat out normal luk It's been proven many times that LUKless > Lowluk / Normal

Robertron 08/15/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Ever since the Agent equips and Pink Tube's were released, the need for luk disappeared.