Mage Damage? - BasilMarket Forum

Mage Damage?

basilmarket.com forums : Mage | 13 posts archived

thread starter 4We2ed0 Aug 06 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

I was just wondering if Hidden Street's magic damage formula was right. If it isn't please tell me the actual formula, help is appreciated, thanks in advance. ~GMS just btw.

lxlelpatronlxl 08/06/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

I always wandered too because hidden street formula takes LUK into count for damage but most people say LUK does not make a difference in damage o.O

kirbyhyper 08/06/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

http://nekonecat.googlepages.com/magicdmg.htm If it doesn't look like this one, then it's wrong.

tugboats 08/06/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

It is wrong. This is the formula: ((Magic^2/1000 + Magic)/30 + INT/200) * Spell Attack * Elemental Advantages * Amplification

4We2ed0 Aug 06 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

tugboats : It is wrong. This is the formula: ((Magic^2/1000 + Magic)/30 + INT/200) * Spell Attack * Elemental Advantages * Amplification Ok thanks. I made a big long thread with HS damage formula's wanted to make sure it was right. ~ Whats the minimum damage formula? ~ Psh yours doesn't use LUK either. kirbyhyper : If it doesn't look like this one, then it's wrong. That formula is wrong, luk adds to the damage a little.

SoupySoupy 08/07/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

LUK adds nothing to damage. At all. Ever.

Todesser 08/07/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

4We2ed0 : Ok thanks. I made a big long thread with HS damage formula's wanted to make sure it was right. ~ Whats the minimum damage formula? ~ Psh yours doesn't use LUK either. ((Magic^2/1000 + Magic)/30 + INT/200) * Spell Attack * Elemental Advantages * Amplification * Skillmastery 4We2ed0 : That formula is wrong, luk adds to the damage a little. So, you want a correct answer when you open a therad, but it has to contain facts, that you think of that they are true. But you are wrong. And even if you are right, you don't have a right to complain, if we wouldn't know the correct answer and provied you with false inforamtion because you asked us to help us. Keep this in mind all the time while posting a therad/post.

UnholyMage24 08/07/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

SoupySoupy : LUK adds nothing to damage. At all. Ever. Is it like that for Mages? Cuz Dex sometimes adds ATK for me.

Rudra 08/07/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Luk add's magic acc by a odd factor. Most luk-less mages can say for sure they have acc issue's with some monstes that a normal luk mage could hit.

lxlelpatronlxl 08/07/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Luk only adds to your acc and adds stability. Ex: A Luk i/l mage can hit 5-6 10k hits in a row with magic composition while a lukless will only hit 2-3 in a row but they will do more damage with each hit canceling the need for stability.

Todesser 08/07/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Rudra : Luk add's magic acc by a odd factor. Most luk-less mages can say for sure they have acc issue's with some monstes that a normal luk mage could hit. bs. luk and int add the same amount of macc lxlelpatronlxl : Luk only adds to your acc and adds stability. Ex: A Luk i/l mage can hit 5-6 10k hits in a row with magic composition while a lukless will only hit 2-3 in a row but they will do more damage with each hit canceling the need for stability. also bs. Teh mastery is affected by the skill, not the luk

JustiniansCode 08/07/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Luklesses don't really have a probelm with accuracy... the only time they probably do, is at SOME bosses. Luklesses train at higher level things than normal LUK mages, yet they can still hit what they're attacking. How much stability does LUk add to damage? Because with thunder spear, I hit anywhere from 7.5-11k, and that's a pretty big gap. I have 112 LUK after equip bonuses btw.

eagleharbor 08/07/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Rudra : Luk add's magic acc by a odd factor. Most luk-less mages can say for sure they have acc issue's with some monstes that a normal luk mage could hit. Not totally true, i dont remember the last time i missed anything, and iam lukless.