I heard today that luk mages are better then lukless because

basilmarket.com forums : Mage | 15 posts archived

thread starter sephshomaru Aug 05 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Luk mages have better attack ranges For example Luk mage genesis 60-80k Lukless 45k-80k Im just a cleric and i was wondering if this was true

FatTurtlez 08/05/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

It is not true. Mathematically luckless magicians > luck magicians, even with the recent E-Wand nerf. However, it is possible for a luck magician to hit more given that he/she has immense funding.

yumtoast154 08/05/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Depends whether or not the mate has a good funding.

mitun733 08/05/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

FatTurtlez said: "It is not true. Mathematically luckless magicians > luck magicians, even with the recent E-Wand nerf. However, it is possible for a luck magician to hit more given that he/she has immense funding." answer is above.

SoupySoupy 08/05/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

No it's not true, anyone who tells you anything of the sort has no idea what they're talking about. And more often than not have their own LUK mages and are in denial. The only way a LUK mage will hit more than a LUKless is if they have a ton more funding. In any other comparison where both mages have the same amount of money the LUKless will be stronger.

Themaplestory3 08/05/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Sometimes lukless>300m funded reg luk. It matters on equips, funding, how much you play, and how much damage you do.

KaRnAgE926 08/05/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

immense funded lukless > immense funded reg luk or low luk

Raysk8s 08/05/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Nope not true, as stated several times above. A poorly funded luk mage will do less damage than a funded luk mage, but when it comes to equal stats and everything, the lukless will end up on top damage wise.

lxlelpatronlxl Aug 05 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

OMG did you people even read what the thread is about...? Is not about who does more damage, it is about who has a better range. People just see words luk vs lukless and always think threads are about higher damage... t(-.-t)

okaycyaround 08/05/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

deja vu O.o

gstatue 08/05/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

lxlelpatronlxl said: "OM do you people even read what the thread is about... is not about who does more damages is about who has a better range. People just see words luk vs lukless and always think threads are about higher damage... t(-.-t)" And...better damage=better range. Soz. No need to rage because lukless mages are superior. Nah, stability has nothing to do with Luk. My friend's meteo range is about 40~59k at 13x, he's lukless. My Bliz range is about 90~110k, and I'm a Luk. There's usually a 20k discrepancy with ultimates, and yeah.

jtt02 08/05/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Who is damage? Is it in Maplestory?

omarofuae 08/06/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

whats the point of being lukless, if u put some luk then u wear high m attk weapons. and if you dont you have high int. LIKE WTF NOOBLETS? go try it out in a p server. i did

cryptlaw 08/06/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

The point in being lukless is having the most int you can and the mattk you get from lukless weapons.

eswarrr 08/06/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Im not obsessed with the damage lukless gives, but the levelling speed.