Lukless mages always better D:

basilmarket.com forums : Mage | 15 posts archived

thread starter koreanbabo Aug 04 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

I just realized that they were even if you are unfunded WHEN IT COMES TO WEAPONS. For example, let's take the simple Wooden Wand with the Dragon Staff. The Dragon Staff requires 113 luck with 125 m. attk while the Wooden Wand requires no luck with merely 23 m. attk. If you subtract 113-4 it becomes 109 extra int that you can add as a luckless. Since 1 int=1 m. attk, you can assume the 109 extra int/ m. attk is also added to that crappy wand, making it the same as 132 m. attk wooden wand :D Also, don't forget the maple items which adds a huge boost to the m. attk! You don't even have to have the element wands to be stronger than them! This is just my theory I came up with like 5 minutes ago. :P I think it's right, but if I'm wrong, please correct me and tell me why =] BTW, I'm only talking about the WEAPONS. Of course armour varies with int bonuses with reg mages and lukless mages and their godly equips. However, don't forget the maple shine wand which is 80 m.attk! That's roughly 57 more m. attk than the wand which will bemore than enough to overcome the simple 10-20 int boost added for reg. luk mage equips. Overall, I think lukless will always be stronger even with the crappy wands/staffs. =]

DenDre 08/04/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

try elewands, no luk, mass matk :P

koreanbabo Aug 04 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Yea o.o That would make them almost 2x better than reg luk mages :P But this is for those who think that lukless mages are too hard to fund.. cause right now those wands are like 100m+ o.o

CreamyTaco 08/04/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

A++ would read again.

koreanbabo 08/04/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Yea. That also means reg. luck mages would have to spend even more money than lukless mages just try and match with them :P No offense to you reg. luck mage peoples btw o.o Just giving my opinion on these

ilovenobs Aug 04 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

koreanbabo said: "Yea. That also means reg. luck mages would have to spend even more money than lukless mages just try and match with them :P No offense to you reg. luck mage peoples btw o.o Just giving my opinion on these" That's not opinion, that's fact. Luckless is mathematically superior.

koreanbabo 08/04/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Well.. Yea I suppose :P But it's gonna suck if every mage out there is luckless... just like the dexless sins

ilovenobs 08/04/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

koreanbabo said: "Well.. Yea I suppose :P But it's gonna suck if every mage out there is luckless... just like the dexless sins" People make Dexless Assassins because they are mathematically superior. I'm not as knowledgeable as I am with Magicians, but I believe that Dexless becomes even with low Dex at higher levels? Anyway, Dexless Assassins are irrelevant.

MysticalPain 08/04/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Lukless = cheaper, stronger, train at higher places quicker, etc. Magic attack also = magic accuracy.

koreanbabo 08/04/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Well actually I think dexless sins will not always be stronger. They only will be if they are funded. 1 luk does not equal 1 wep. attk unlike mages where 1 int does equal 1 m. attk. And the claws only go up to the maple skanda (I think)

ilovenobs 08/04/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

MysticalPain said: "Lukless = cheaper, stronger, train at higher places quicker, etc. Magic attack also = magic accuracy." Magic attack doesn't give magic accuracy. INT & LUCK do.

koreanbabo 08/04/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Yea and int has much more added bonuses than just reg. magic attack with reg. luck

MysticalPain 08/04/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

ilovenobs said: " Magic attack doesn't give magic accuracy. INT & LUCK do." Luck has nothing to do with accuracy, trust me. INT = magic attack anyway.

ilovenobs Aug 04 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

MysticalPain said: " Luck has nothing to do with accuracy, trust me. INT = magic attack anyway." A level 1xx Arch Mage who has played for 4 years & studied useless magician information will know more than level 82 priest.

MysticalPain 08/04/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

ilovenobs said: " A level 135 Arch Mage who has played for 4 years & studied useless magician information will know more than level 82 priest." A level 82 LUKLESS priest might know a bit about LUKLESS information. Especially when I could train at certain places compared to other people that had luk. Next time don't think you know more than someone just because you think you're so much better.