Is Nexon Going to Patch the 52 stat HT Pendants?

basilmarket.com forums : General Maple Story | 15 posts archived

thread starter GameeOver Jul 31 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Or was it meant to be like this? If they do patch them from being created, will they take the ones away from people that already have them? (Such as myself) I know in KMS and other versions of MapleStory, they don't have 82 stat pendants. But, KMS doesn't have Hammers either. So it gives me reason to believe it was meant to be like this. Can anyone clear it up?

5o4B0i 07/31/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

i sure hope not

Tufas 07/31/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

nexon should remove VH becausae if they want items to have 2more slots why dont they make them have 2+ slots instead of u have to waste 8.5k nexon on 2slots

GameeOver Jul 31 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

They want money, so they won't do that @ Tufas. And i sure hope they don't either. I have 5 pendants that are all 52 stat LOL

sleepyxdude 07/31/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Probably not. That was the point of vicious hammers. To make our items even stronger

FlameOfDark 07/31/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Tufas said: "nexon should remove VH becausae if they want items to have 2more slots why dont they make them have 2+ slots instead of u have to waste 8.5k nexon on 2slots" That's stupid.

3xdex 07/31/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

they want ht to be more popular :3

GameeOver 07/31/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Yeah but I figured they might have over-looked the pendant situation and they could consider it as a loop-hole.

MagicSheepz 07/31/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Tufas said: "nexon should remove VH becausae if they want items to have 2more slots why dont they make them have 2+ slots instead of u have to waste 8.5k nexon on 2slots" ....thats the point.. so nexon can make more money >.> use your brain sometime.

WetFish 07/31/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

To be honest, I don't like the fact that a glitch was abused to obtain this item. If this item had been made through a legitimate means that didnt abuse the first egg quest, then i wouldnt care. Its going to be removed, mabye not the pendant, but the glitch will be patched, then there will be a select few with those pendants.

Tufas 07/31/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

FlameOfDark said: " That's stupid." is it? so paying for something is fine but have the same thing w/o paying is stupid? dare to explain me this?

oimie 07/31/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Tufas said: "nexon should remove VH becausae if they want items to have 2more slots why dont they make them have 2+ slots instead of u have to waste 8.5k nexon on 2slots" ... Man... I have to become captain obvious beause apparently its not obvious enough to this person. Nexon wants to make money duhhhh. What do you mean Nexon want items to have 2 more slots. They can careless how many slots an item has.

mikerae16 07/31/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Tufas said: "nexon should remove VH becausae if they want items to have 2more slots why dont they make them have 2+ slots instead of u have to waste 8.5k nexon on 2slots" why would they do it for free when they could make alot of money off of it people forget that even though they run this game they are still a coperation and at the end of the day all a coperation cares about is money

Desiderata03 07/31/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

I think they're just going to leave them as is and never release the last 2 normal slots. If they did though, it wouldn't be all bad. I think it makes sense for HT pendants to be better, since they're a lot harder to get. But really, if you get 82 stats from a pendant, there's really no reason not to be dexless/strless/lukless since with that and equips you could equip good weapons anyway.

GameeOver Jul 31 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

I sure hope it doesnt get patched. Atleast i'll be stacked up on a few though. But they wouldn't make you pay 8k nx or so for your last two slots, would they? @above