9/11 Conspiracy.

basilmarket.com forums : Chat | 16 posts archived

thread starter darksol4eva Jul 20 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Was it all a conspiracy? Or did it actually happen by these so called terrorist? I personally believe it was all a conspiracy set up by the American government to get the things they really want, people that are willing to fight in an army to protect a false belief of terrorism striking, oil, space and etc! Lets here what you have to say... Basilmarket!

Panicka Jul 20 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

darksol4eva said: " Why would someone such as this rank of technology be willing to support this exact theory if he himself is an american?" Because they can't accept certain things about life and look for holes in everything to make themself feel better or support anti-government establishments? Your cell phone theory has been disproven a trillion times, look it up.

Etokapa 07/20/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

I want to believe so much that it was a terrorist attack. I've seen so many videos debunking each other but the one thing that really gets me is that there's no videos of the pentagon getting hit.

wasdf 07/20/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Why Sept. 11, you may ask?

Persephone 07/20/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

darksol4eva said: " Because if you clearly think about it, behind all thiese dead innocent people, american government gets what they want. * LIHOP ("let it happen on purpose") - suggests that key individuals within the government had at least some foreknowledge of the attacks and deliberately ignored them or actively weakened America's defenses to ensure the hijacked flights were not intercepted. * MIHOP ("made it happen on purpose") - that key individuals within the government planned the attacks and collaborated with or framed, al-Qaeda in carrying them out. There is a range of opinions about how this might have been achieved." didn`t osama bin laden say "all of this was my doing"? elaborate on "key individuals". at that time, there haven`t been any major air attacks on america; airport security wasn`t tight enough. so in essence, you can`t say they weakened the security when it wasn`t even taken that seriously.

pokercrazed 07/20/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

I personally do believe it was planned. Why were there explosions going off on floors under the ones that were actually hit? Why was there molten rock at the base of the building? This, to me, says that there were explosives in the lowest levels of the building because it doesnt seem likely that the whole building could topple over an impact like that.

Applesnacks 07/20/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

mag3rang3 said: "Those towers were worth trillions of dollars, you think the american government is that stupid to lose all that money >.>" Its not worth Trillions. The Oil and other stuff in the middle east is worth more than two towers.

Panicka 07/20/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Applesnacks said: " Its not worth Trillions. The Oil and other stuff in the middle east is worth more than two towers." And we're not getting any of it. So no point there.

darksol4eva 07/20/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Persephone said: " didn`t osama bin laden say "all of this was my doing"? elaborate on "key individuals". at that time, there haven`t been any major air attacks on america; airport security wasn`t tight enough. so in essence, you can`t say they weakened the security when it wasn`t even taken that seriously." Osama and the American Government went way back as to supplying weapons to each other in the past, what makes you think they are not both allies and both in on the conspiracy for their own uses?

Panicka 07/20/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

darksol4eva said: " Osama and the American Government went way back as to supplying weapons to each other in the past, what makes you think they are not both allies and both in on the conspiracy for their own uses?" Tell me. What exactly have we gained from it?

mag3rang3 07/20/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Applesnacks said: " Its not worth Trillions. The Oil and other stuff in the middle east is worth more than two towers." Well based on what kind of marketing and business in the towers were done, losing all of that can be worth as much as a trillion dollars. Plus knowing all the surrounding buildings were damaged, and at one point here in NYC, theres going to be new towers set up and there will. The freedom tower, and that's worth billions building just the base of it.

FreeSamples 07/20/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Didja guys know that Osama was a CIA trained Operative?

wasdf 07/20/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

FreeSamples said: "Didja guys know that Osama was a CIA trained Operative?" Noo waii. D:

Persephone Jul 20 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

pokercrazed said: "I personally do believe it was planned. Why were there explosions going off on floors under the ones that were actually hit? Why was there molten rock at the base of the building? This, to me, says that there were explosives in the lowest levels of the building because it doesnt seem likely that the whole building could topple over an impact like that." the planes landed well above the top 3/4 of the buildings. it wasn`t the planes that brought it down, as the steel of the buildings was way too strong- it was the weight & rapidly melting steel that toppled the buildings. @TS: the U.S. partnered with the Taliban, not al-Qaeda. & this was when the Soviet Union [a common enemy] threatened Afghanistan. what common enemy is there now? the al-Qaeda are fighting a jihad. they`re not plotting with Bush.

skittlesmoo 07/20/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

... *no comment* This is so ridiculously stupid I can't even say anything to rebut your claim.

darksol4eva 07/20/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Persephone said: " the planes landed well above the top 3/4 of the buildings. it wasn`t the planes that brought it down, as the steel of the buildings was way too strong- it was the weight & rapidly melting steel that toppled the buildings." Nico Haupt and Morgan Reynolds, formerly the chief economist within the Labor Department under the Bush administration argue that no planes were used in the attacks. "There were no planes, there were no hijackers," Reynolds insists. "I know, I know, I'm out of the mainstream, but that's the way it is." According to David Shayler, "The only explanation is that they were missiles surrounded by holograms made to look like planes," he says. "Watch footage frame by frame and you will see a cigar-shaped missile hitting the World Trade Center."