are lukless bishop really worth it?

basilmarket.com forums : Mage | 15 posts archived

thread starter iAmAbel Jul 16 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

i just wanted to no the pros of being a lukless bishop and lucky bishop also how fast are they at lvling from 51-120 and can u tell me good places to train

Themaplestory3 07/16/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

At the very end, yes. If your not planning on 4th job, no.

OneWishes 07/16/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Lukless bishops are sexy.

Themaplestory3 07/16/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

OneWishes said: "Lukless bishops are sexy." Not really. LowLuk get the cool equips, they get the damage.

iAmAbel 07/16/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

lol ok ty ima (try my best) to get to 4th job :D

Themaplestory3 07/16/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Its not that hard. Max heal first in second, train at sand rats/zombie mushrooms till lv35, go to jr. wraiths till about 40-45, go to cpq till 50, then try mp3 to lv75, then try himes till lv120-125 then go to skeles.

iAmAbel 07/16/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

wow is it really that easy and how fast do u think ima be lvling

cje2062248 07/16/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Themaplestory3 said: " Not really. LowLuk get the cool equips, they get the damage." LOL luckless dont worry about how they look since they are getting comon (like dexcless sin is now a style) anyway... Pro of luckless: - Even unfunded, ull hit higher dmg then reg/low luk (if the guy for sure not much funded (1m or so in luckless = 10m fund of reg/low luk)) - Im a cleric lvl 53 atm and i outdmg some f/p and i/l lvl 52 (ok i got 1 more lvl, but arent cleric supose to be suckiest attacker(i hit 1200-1600 dmg/magic claw while i/l = 1200-1500 with ice and f/p was 1400-1600 with fire arrow)? and we have no att skill so) and they were low luk so i guess its pretty godly) - Being luckless doesnt meen being funded: i only spent 5m on this char ( well i traded deputy and a clean zhelm and a 7/7/7 puac). -When u get luckless, you don't have to take care about which final equip you can get: sauna/el wand/ zhelm/htpendant/glove(comon)/ysn/puac that mean no worry about checking to not pass a luk lvl -People dont really care if you are lukless unfunded since they think you are mostly a buff (that is bugging, but you don't have to worry so much of ur equips since 4th job) -We are better then any low/reg luk even if they have timeless weapon at max! SO LUKLESS FTW

iAmAbel 07/16/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

lol ok ima b lukless so far im lvl 12 rofl

TiMmYDouGj Jul 16 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Themaplestory3 said: " Not really. LowLuk get the cool equips, they get the damage." ...You might want to check over this again. Last time I checked, "LowLuk" doesn't exactly work the same was as "LowDex". And I think the reasoning was because 1MA = 1int So every extra point of "Int" into your stats is another increment in strength. Meaning, if you put puts into Luk and wasted away equip slots to add even more Luk... You're losing out on a lot of potential "Int", even with the additional Magic from the Wand/Staff. Go Lukless. It's easier. Unfunded Lukless > Unfunded Normal Luk The pros of using Luk is the equips for some people...I never liked how they looked.

JimmySplorgen 07/16/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

i dont want to wear a moldy bath robe all my life

TiMmYDouGj 07/16/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

JimmySplorgen said: "i dont want to wear a moldy bath robe all my life " It's pixels. And plus, the SAUNA robe looks like a far more pleasing set of pixels than...Any Varune ever will.

taotapp Jul 16 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Oh, of course it's worth it. There's a reason there are so many lukless Bishops running around nowadays. You'll get more mp, more damage, a bigger MW boost, the training skills of an AM for the price of a bishop, HS, res, heal, of course it's worth it, man! xD

eswarrr 07/16/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Do you know lukless is native to bishops, meaning there were plenty of lukless bishops out there even before the term lukless was coined. Don't listen to the people "It's not worth it if you not plan on 4th job, blah blah".

Themaplestory3 07/16/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

TiMmYDouGj said: " ...You might want to check over this again. Last time I checked, "LowLuk" doesn't exactly work the same was as "LowDex". And I think the reasoning was because 1MA = 1int So every extra point of "Int" into your stats is another increment in strength. Meaning, if you put puts into Luk and wasted away equip slots to add even more Luk... You're losing out on a lot of potential "Int", even with the additional Magic from the Wand/Staff. Go Lukless. It's easier. Unfunded Lukless > Unfunded Normal Luk The pros of using Luk is the equips for some people...I never liked how they looked." GUYS! He said: LUKless is sexy. I said not really cuz their equips dont look as cool as LowLuk oned. Sheesh