Who would win in a war? India or China?

basilmarket.com forums : Chat | 16 posts archived

thread starter NerdyMapleGeek Jul 12 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

If there was a conflict between the two country's and they went to war and all other country's stood out who would win?

Delisaurus 07/13/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

lol. India vs China Prison break much? heehee

KingDragon 07/13/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Jonathan5525 said: "China has more mesos than India. China wins (Not to mention the no delay nuclear bomb hackers). O.o" Lol.....

souljuh 07/13/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

I laughed at the person who said China was poor. LOLOLOLOL, see? Okay, but really, those who say 'nukes win wars' should also perhaps focus on the fact that they're neighbouring countries? Deliver them first, you win. In terms of raw nuclear weapon power, I don't know who'd win. In conventional warfare (ie. no chemical, biological or nuclear weapons), China will almost indefinitely win. However, the navy wouldn't help too much on that one unless they're taking over Thailand, Laos, etc. with it, since it's a great distance from China to India and vice-versa over water. Just take a look at the map and you'd know what I mean. Neither sides have much access with a navy.

xWheezerx 07/13/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

souljuh said: "I laughed at the person who said China was poor. LOLOLOLOL, see? Okay, but really, those who say 'nukes win wars' should also perhaps focus on the fact that they're neighbouring countries? Deliver them first, you win. In terms of raw nuclear weapon power, I don't know who'd win. In conventional warfare (ie. no chemical, biological or nuclear weapons), China will almost indefinitely win. However, the navy wouldn't help too much on that one unless they're taking over Thailand, Laos, etc. with it, since it's a great distance from China to India and vice-versa over water. Just take a look at the map and you'd know what I mean. Neither sides have much access with a navy." China's nuclear program is much more advanced than India's, so China would win a nuclear war also.

aznseal 07/13/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

China for sure.

Doomsday777 07/13/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

What type of war? A dance off?

heinous 07/13/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

China. India's too busy killing off all their soldiers and military with their eternal conflict with Pakistan. ._.

blick 07/13/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

dilsl said: "The country I'm from has two words, one starting with S and the other with L. Funnily enough, we aren't that known in America and maybe Canada, but in most other countries in the world we are." U is Sri Lankan?

WolfXLord 07/13/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

China would easily win, even if India had double the population China would win. I don't see India as a world threat and they really aren't considering 80% of the population lives in poverty and can't really be in the army. I doubt the technology and the army would even be able to hold that many people.

Brutus 07/13/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Both will win har har

yayo150 07/13/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Neither would win. They are both nuclear powers and all it would take is one bomb to screw the other country over. :/

xD4rkSidex 07/13/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

well the only importantce here since both countries are tied in population is health, weapons technology and social adhesion health obviously for better front line killing proficiency, weapons technology is absolutely necessary to any war if you disagree talk to the Russians in the first world war, huge huge numbers but were all slaughtered by the germans who had all the weapons they needed, and men on horses are rather easy to shoot at those are easy to understand but you wonder social cohesion? india is racist, to my information, its still highly racist, to their own nationality of course, class division means that potential corruption, and disorder between the troops, as opposed to the chinese, damn son, you dont wanna know how hardcore they are. you dont want to know.

greenelf 07/13/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

wth....<posttoshort:P>

Pompoon 07/13/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Evilinc said: "So far, most of these posts only talk about population. However, quality over quantity. I don't know which country's army regime is more intense so that is a blank (for now). Also, the higher the army's count, the more resources it uses. This leads to... Landmass and resources. China does have the bigger territory. The more land, the more resources it can handle and spare. Someone will need to dig up the land usage of each country. Even if China does have more land, are they able to use it? Remember, in WW2, Russia used the "Scorched Earth" technique. This exhausted Germany's advancing forces. Weather and climate are also a factor in determining a country's ability to win. Droughts can often lead to heat waves and weaker men. Floods can destroy defenses and routes. Again, I'm not familiar with each country's climate. After examining these factors, we can decide which country would win in a war. 1 vs 1." Let me just add that china isnt as big as people beleive. The Gobi desert noms ALOT of space o-o and people say its spreading.

uhohlol 07/13/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

this thread is useless because in no way would China EVER consider attacking India or vice versa. This is because both of them are still developing nations, yes even China. Both of there economic status is on the rise and a war would shatter there economies, businesses would leave, jobs would be lost and both of their stabilizing forms of society would be rocketed back to the stone age if a full scale war was to ensue. They have both come so far they will not, I REPEAT will not go to war with ANYONE in the next 50 years unless threatened to do so and there is a very slim chance that they would threaten each other.