themaplestory3 is

basilmarket.com forums : Mage | 16 posts archived

thread starter Themaplestory3 Jul 10 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

laughing his head off. You all got tricked by the trick master: kidsun. You guys need to relax.

taotapp Jul 11 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Torchalan said: " I've heard both contribute equally. This is a tricky one... I can make an all luck mage with my Bonefish leech and post SSes of it hitting monsters if you want." An all luk mage seems like absolute hell. In the end, I guess magic accuracy doesn't matter too much, since level probably plays the biggest role anyway. Whatever. @ gandalf: If they both contribute equally to magic accuracy, then why do you people keep praising LUK for its effects on magic accuracy? This wouldn't even be an issue if people would stop bashing others when they say that INT aids in magic accuracy, but I've seen you go against that claim several times, practically implying that LUK had a greater impact. Unfortunately, I can't prove it, so it's a moot point. >_> Kidsun, you were completely serious when you started this thread. If you want out, just stop posting.

Themaplestory3 07/11/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

I wasnt serious. Its called "humiliating for fun" i act serious to get people to start flaming cuz its funny. Tricking people is so much fun HAHAHAHAHAHA! ROOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFFFFLLLLL

sonny2000 Jul 11 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

taotapp said: " We need to have an official stance on this. Either LUK mages get better accuracy, or LUKless mages do. Seriously, this bothers me now. Whenever I say what you're saying, people cite the magic accuracy formula, which shows that LUK plays a rather large role in magic accuracy. Despite this, my own experiences in game have shown otherwise." When i was in the luckless guild around 2.5 years ago, we made a guild project, we started 2 magicians, a pure luk magician and a pure int magician, the pure luk had a lot more magic accuracy, but it was not practical, because his damage was always 1 or 1/1, in theory, the best in this aspect should be the hybrid (because the combination of luk and int), the regular luk magician, but in the practice, the luckless is above by a little.

Torchalan 07/11/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

taotapp said: " An all luk mage seems like absolute hell. In the end, I guess magic accuracy doesn't matter too much, since level probably plays the biggest role anyway. Whatever. @ gandalf: If they both contribute equally to magic accuracy, then why do you people keep praising LUK for its effects on magic accuracy? This wouldn't even be an issue if people would stop bashing others when they say that INT aids in magic accuracy, but I've seen you go against that claim several times, practically implying that LUK had a greater impact. Unfortunately, I can't prove it, so it's a moot point. >_> Kidsun, you were completely serious when you started this thread. If you want out, just stop posting. " It's actually quite easy, I'll do it sometime for 'teh lulz.' Also, Kidsun, I would say the bold part if Taotapp didn't.

Inferno 07/11/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Themaplestory3 said: " Was talking to gandalf/torchalan/inferno. But you still disagree with luk mages. Luk will be useful when timeless comes out. Btw how much did that DD cost you?" I have around 60 to 70 mages in buddy list (maxed). Around 30 are Luck mages. I don't disagree with going luck. It's annoying when you go into like 7 different threads saying "I like luck" every 2nd page.

IImaplers 07/11/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Maplestory3: kidsun hater IImaplers: Oh you mean "Whoa, that just massively pwned themaplestory3. I think his posts are annoying as well but what do you expect?, this is basil. Having looked at Joe's listing, I agree that the post in question was the equivalent to flamebaiting. I think themaplestory3 should stop this although lately I've noticed that he has been somewhat helpful for certain threads in the mage section. Just a suggestion x]" That is not hate, that's just a suggestion to stop the misleading and pointless posts. Notice where I said you seemed to have a streak of helpful threads. That =/= hate. You are this close to losing the only friend you may have on basil... I was on your side up until this point.... Have fun with your internet bravado... Maplestory3: Kidsun hater......Ya right! I checked torch's thread, dont be two faced like inferno.Lol i have lots of freinds, they arent on the LUKless bandwagon. Everybody who hates me is on there. My posts are true, luk will become useful when timeless come out. OT:Sorry for misinterpreting your post, im so tired of bandwagoned mages saying im useless cuz im for luk. Its so annoying. IImaplers: Well, torch and gando are not bandwagon nor are they flaming. You are looking pretty foolish for thinking that's the case. If I were you, I'd apologize F3 Maplestory3: Ummm why? Do you know why they hate me? They said it in my face:We dont like your posts on LUK is good, its worthless" See? They're on the bandwagon and did you read gandalfs posts? He started to flame for no reason. This is what im against. IImaplers: Again, your posts were misinforming the general reader with unproven claims, plus a few of your posts are flamebaiting. They have a right to disagree with you. You replying with claims that they are flaming you is nonsense. I hope you can understand this. Maplestory3: Yes im smart, but i have seen them both say to me LUK is useless when i was chatting in a LowLuk thread. Btw: Why are you a guy playing a girl? o.o IImaplers: Right now it is much more beneficial for a mage to be LUKless than have normal LUK. That is a PROVEN FACT due to a large increase in damage. You still disagree? btw, im an asexual alien life form Maplestory3: Lol nice joke but if people wanna go LowLuk/Reg Luk for equips, let them. He flames me for flaming a guy for saying: Luk sucks, don't do it. Your stupid for getting luk. That gets me mad(that wasnt gandy btw) because im lowluk(+zhelm i have enough for DD) IImaplers: point me to that exact thread? Maplestory3: It got blocked BTE can you help me? I cant post links..... How do you do it? Btw check my trick thread again. *facepalm*

Themaplestory3 07/11/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Lol trix you all >:D And Inferno, it was stopping you from fighting. I like LUK.

XG0213 07/11/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

taotapp said: " An all luk mage seems like absolute hell. In the end, I guess magic accuracy doesn't matter too much, since level probably plays the biggest role anyway. Whatever. @ gandalf: If they both contribute equally to magic accuracy, then why do you people keep praising LUK for its effects on magic accuracy? This wouldn't even be an issue if people would stop bashing others when they say that INT aids in magic accuracy, but I've seen you go against that claim several times, practically implying that LUK had a greater impact. Unfortunately, I can't prove it, so it's a moot point. >_> Kidsun, you were completely serious when you started this thread. If you want out, just stop posting." Nope. I have never said x > y, I always say Luk = Int for M. Acc and quote the formula.

taotapp Jul 11 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

^ Alright. Maybe I misunderstood, then. sonny2000 said: " When i was in the lucless guild around 2.5 years ago, we made a guild project, we started 2 magicians, a pure luk magician and a pure int magician, the pure luk had a lot more magic accuracy, but it was not practical, because his damage was always 1 or 1/1, in theory, the best in this aspect should be the hybrid (because the combination of luk and int), the regular luk magician, but in the practice, the luckless is above by a little. " This is interesting, especially since a similar study performed on sleepywood had the opposite results. Eh, to hell with it. I'm gonna go watch Batman.

Number1Hater 07/11/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Kidsun stop trying to gain E-fame on a teenagers forum on a 2d side scrolling game

Themaplestory3 07/11/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Lol wow this one actually got pretty deep. GJ BASILERS!

acecroc 07/11/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Themaplestory3 said: "laughing his head off. You all got tricked by the trick master: kidsun. You guys need to relax." Because this was all your evil plot... Right.

Inferno 07/11/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Ohhh, I'mma two face now? Go f iretr uck yourself

Fluxion 07/11/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Torchalan said: " Why are we so hot-headed?" buda bum ching!

XG0213 07/11/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Themaplestory3 said: " You werent at my last thread: Pages I do this for fun and to prove how deep maplers get when irrated like you. This is sooo fun." Weren't you going camping or something? Shouldn't you be gone already? In other words, Gtho, no one wants you here. Stupid noob.