KMSing Stage 8 of LPQ.

basilmarket.com forums : General Maple Story | 14 posts archived

thread starter BrickTheHun Jul 05 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Can someone explain how it works and the benefits of this over the conventional method? Thanks.

inuman2006 07/05/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Wasn't is JMS? Whatever.. I forget anyways But it benefits you because you can just walk down onto the next number, instead of jumping to each of them. It's basicly faster if you know how to do it properly

Weeeddd 07/05/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

This is hard over a computer. I guess i can only say it's way faster than doing every box. It lets' someone cover two boxes, therefore taking off one entire part of the stage. sorry if that's unclear;/

308654227111 07/05/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Well it's all chance but, sometimes you know the combo could be the very last one... so KMS way of doing is just a way to like spread out which combination you tries.

BrickTheHun 07/05/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Alright, thanks for the help so far. What's the order of combinations like?

MysticSpeII 07/05/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Imagine it like this. You do the regular method until the "2" person moves to "3". Then you click, and the "1" person goes to "2" and clicks. Now they go back to "1" and click. Do this in pattern with 1,2,3,4, etc.

MyNaginata 07/05/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

I was wondering what benefits it offers over the conventional way (besides a little saved time) because I've LPQed on old characters back when the LPQ was mad crowded and the KMS way is rather confusing to me.

MysticSpeII 07/05/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

You have to get used to it. Around 2~4 PQ's should do it.

xinxe 07/05/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

I prefer the LPQ way. Cause it all comes down to chance anyways.

xVani 07/05/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

It keeps everyone moving so they dun get lazy =P

codypwnsu2 07/05/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Once it gets to 13456, number 1 switches between 1 and 2 each time, and then once the person after 1 moves, it adds a number. So 1 2 1 2 1 2 -number 3 moves to 4- 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 -number 4 moves to 5- 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4. Confusing, but you'd get it if you saw it.

Kyensho Jul 05 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Basically once it looks like this Diagram [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] [ 4 ] [ 5 ] [ 6 ] [ 7 ] [ 8 ] [ 9 ] While the person who was originally on 2 moves to 3, the person on 1 rotates 1 and 2 to speed it up and save time, rather than going through every number at a different time. @ Above Hi Cody. You can look at his explanation and look at the diagram I did.

TheGoatfry 07/05/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

the K/JMS method is not actually that much faster, and in reality, if the number is like 13456 i think you'll get it quicker in the conventional way. both are easy to learn, its just that no one in GMS does KMS style, so... stick with conventional.

codypwnsu2 07/05/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

TheGoatfry said: "the K/JMS method is not actually that much faster, and in reality, if the number is like 13456 i think you'll get it quicker in the conventional way. both are easy to learn, its just that no one in GMS does KMS style, so... stick with conventional." That's what I tell people, but they still insist on doing it. If it's a combo with 1 in it, GMS would be much faster. ._. Either way you'd have to do each combo if it was the last one. D; (Which I've gotten.)