Lukless or Lowluk

basilmarket.com forums : Mage | 15 posts archived

thread starter kidjonniee Jul 03 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

I'm currently a lukless f/p. I'm asking if I should convert to low luk since I'm really going to use poison and poison doesn't really need damage. But if not can you state why it's better for me to stay or convert? thanks EDIT: Should I use hp equips when I train with poison? Would HP equips be cheaper than INT equips?

LukLessEMS 07/03/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Stay Lukless. Going Low Luk is far more expensive, and not really worth it.

AudioTrauma 07/03/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

LukLessEMS said: "Stay Lukless. Going Low Luk is far more expensive, and not really worth it." LOL @ that. Bunch of bull, if you ask me. Haven't you noticed that lukless equips are FAR more expensive that low luk equips? o-O I mean, a sauna with +23 int would be about 500 mil, while an overall with the same amount of int for a low luk would cost only about 250 mil, even less, if you get lucky. Besides, you have to spend TONS of mesos to get to the same level as a low luk mage. If you want to spend more mesos to be in the same attack range as low luk mages, go lukless. Otherwise, go low luk and spend less. :]

LaCu 07/03/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

i have a 149 bish. if u ask me its really worth it to go lukless. even if u use bad equipment u have a better attack range than most good equipped lowluk mages. stay lukless!

Athey Jul 03 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

to be honest, at this point in time, I find completely luckless to be cheaper (for ME) then going low luck. My Priest was low luck and I spent tons of money on a new weapon every 10-15 levels. And I couldn't keep up with that. As a luckless I pay for 3 maple weapons and resell 2... :s And as far as overall int stuff goes. I can't even afford 20+ int overalls regardless of whether I'm luckless or not so that isn't relevant to me either. I'm not sure about the original poster, though. Low luck can be more expensive (luck earrings vs. int earrings) and can be cheaper (luck shields vs int +m.atk shields) and no luck can be more expensive (20 int overalls vs. 8 int 4 luck 98 overall on my priest). Although with luck, you need to find a stopping point. Otherwise all your luck equips will go 1:1 with the amount of int you were able to put in. Stopping at 85 seemed rather good for me at least. I could get a 117 attack kage and only had 60 base luck. But of course, I had an int cape on. So my base could have easily been 50 (or lower, I think I put some luck in to wear the 98 overall).

KingTollow 07/03/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

might as well stay lukless

masterspeaks 07/03/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Lukless all the way.

ando2112 07/03/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

I need help on the Old Fox Quest Help here plz =/ link

Lawligator 07/03/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Don't go low luck or nothing you crazy people go normal then get an e wand/staff in your higher lvls and PWN! but if yu don't plan on reaching like lvl 90 or so don't bother go luckless.. >:p

BulletLove 07/03/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Lawligator said: "Don't go low luck or nothing you crazy people go normal then get an e wand/staff in your higher lvls and PWN! but if yu don't plan on reaching like lvl 90 or so don't bother go luckless.. >:p" Lukless>Normal. even if you get the 160 wand. The extra int + the 130 wand is far better.

spiderpig007 07/03/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

BulletLove said: " Lowluk>Lukless. " Fixed. I'm a lowluk mage. I get around +30 luk from my equips. That's gonna be useful when I equip my end game wep, a lvl 163 estaff. I'll be more powerful than lukless, because they're using a staff with worse base stats, if they are both scrolled the same. I'll be more powerful than reg luk, because they aren't as smart as I am (I know, bad joke)

Hatorade Jul 03 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Well, apparently, according to Kratos99(hi max<3), Elemental Wands, yes wands, not staves, now require Luk to weild them, so going Low Luk is honestly the better choice, unless you have a 110+ stat shine wand. Elemental Wands and Staves will drop in prices, and tons of them will flood the market from lukless users no longer being able to use them, shine wands and blade staves will skyrocket. I don't agree personally, but Kratos99 is a very credible source, so it's up to you guys to decide whether to believe it or not. EDIT: Spiderpig, how is a 163Staff that requires 165 luk to weild, with only 178 magic attack on average, a total of positive 41magic attack if you subtract the luk from the magic attack, and assuming you have a scrolled HT pendant, Z Helm, and 4base luk, better than a 130Wand which is 145magic attack on average, and requires no luk, so it is a positive 145magic attack, because you lose nothing on AP.

KaRnAgE926 07/03/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Stay Lukless

Korean 07/03/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Noob question: do lowluk wear luk overalls/capes?

Hatorade 07/03/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Korean said: "Noob question: do lowluk wear luk overalls/capes?" That's a matter of preference, most likely no, but they can.