NL low-dex vs dexless

basilmarket.com forums : General Maple Story | 15 posts archived

thread starter aznboy808 Jun 18 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

please excuse my grammar. hey does anyone know which is better in the long run dexless or low-dex NL both funded. lets say a dexless has a 57att skanda, 9att pac, 7att fs, 13luk earrings, 27luk rone, 15att scg, and a low-dex with 62att craven/caster, 15scg, 3/4att 10dex+pac, dex robe, 2att 5dex fs, 13dex earrings which would be stronger in the long run im aiming for one of them. oh yea both have zhelms. thx XD

greatgodkt 06/18/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

lowdex in the future will own the dexless

JuanGotoh 06/18/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

well you should add 1 or 2 dex for each equip for the lowdex because they are cheaper...

aznboy808 06/18/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

well if low-dex will be better then dexless ill aim for low-dex then.

Joshseow 06/18/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

low dex will be better unless you can pump ur dex uber high through equips alone

4znGotRic3 06/18/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Lowdex is better than dexless after 120, but those equips you've listed there for the dexless surpass the lowdex's funding by a LOT

TiMmYDouGj 06/18/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

According to the info you put, it should be the dexless sin. But overall, a lowdex would be better. But if you're really able to get 7 ATT FS and a 9 ATT PAC...57 Scanda...Etc...Then yes, Dexless. IF those equips you stated for both types were taken into account. I think.

Number1Hater 06/18/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

This lookes like a showoff thread but your strong

aznboy808 06/18/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

no its not a showoff thread im just wondering which will be stronger and so far i have everthing except for a 57att skanda but i can get a 55att so which will be stronger if i had the 55att skanda.

FistedYaGF 06/18/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Dexless is better until 4th job. Horntail Claw's WATK nicely scrolled surpasses the boosts from heaps of LUK, so low DEX wins.

codypwnsu2 Jun 18 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

4znGotRic3 said: "Lowdex is better than dexless after 120, but those equips you've listed there for the dexless surpass the lowdex's funding by a LOT" You'd think a Night Lord would know more about his job and the damage formula. There's not a certain level that Low-DEX surpasses DEXless... Becoming fourth job does not make low dex any more powerful than DEXless. It's not until around 14x when the w.att to luk ratio is high enough to wear a good attack dex claw is CHEAPER and more AFFORDABLE, but to those who can afford a good DEXless claw will be dealing the better damage. A Dexless user wearing the equips you listed would by far outdamage a low dex with but a mere 62 attack claw.

TeefBlade 06/18/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

go 25base dex and if you're rich enough equip a craven or sleeve :D

aznboy808 06/18/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

wow now im debating which one i should go for but i hear people saying lowdex wins so ill choose low-dex now i have to figure out wear to cap my dex.

MexA Jun 18 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

That's just a ridiculous comparison. You've completely underfunded the low dex option. A 3/4 atk 10 Dex PAC is not even a fraction of the price of a 9atk cape. And 7 Atk FS are much more than 2 Atk 5 Dex FS. And the claw would have to be at least 67atk to be comparable. And you didn't include a Luk top for the low dex which could easily be 20+ Luk for less money than the 27 Luk robe. If you want a proper comparison, at least offer equips of a similar value.

kyoboy Jun 18 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

i think a low-dex with 62atk claw 15atk scg 9atk pac and 7atk fs would be better and btw you should get MoN (10atk) Edit: i think you should just get a higher atk claw cuz i don't think 7atk (62-55) worth 125 Luk and if you can get a dex bottom and luk top it would be better than a dex robe