The truth about dexless sins.

basilmarket.com forums : Thief | 15 posts archived

thread starter brandonce Jun 14 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Ok, so currently i have made i dexless(like the rest of maple story) and i have leveled him from 20-40 in about 2 days and the damage is awesome compared to others my level. But what im scared about is that i wont have enough money to get a "godly" skanda and my damage will just go off the deep end and suck when all the reg dex sins get a higher attack claw. So whats the truth? Can an ok skanda and a sin with all luk compare to a reg dex with higher attack claw? Is there any Dexlesses out there willing to explain if our damage will stay strong till 4th job or should i just start putting dex in now to go low dex (level 42 right now) Also which is more expensive -low dex or dexless Plz help a fellow sin out and thanks!

xXCr34myXx 06/14/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Weak skanda or not dexless sins will stay the strongest till 120, but around 90+ reg dex sins start catching up. Also dexless sins cost more since luk equips cost a lot more then dex equips.

brandonce 06/14/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

ok, thanks. :D

Pepperpost 06/14/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Low dex is less expensive.

Mancartia 06/14/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Low dex will cost more, the claws do have higher attack but they cost a lot too >_> If I were dexless and had all my money in a Skanda instead of a Casters + dex equips, I would definitely do more damage.

shade4 06/15/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Okay heres exactly what you need to know. If you have alot of money to fund either a low dex or a dexless The low dex will be better. A well funded low dex is the best you can get but a well funded dexless is great until 120 also. Low dex > Dexless in the long run

purplhaze 06/15/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

i wouldnt go dexless since timeless weapons are coming out

Shatterss 06/15/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

shade4 said: "Okay heres exactly what you need to know. If you have alot of money to fund either a low dex or a dexless The low dex will be better. A well funded low dex is the best you can get but a well funded dexless is great until 120 also. Low dex > Dexless in the long run" 120 my arse! Seems like you only know poor dexless wannabes. Dexless>low dex but it all depends in funding. Atm at higher lvs low dex is better but soon higher dexless claws will be released. And to some fool who mentioned timeless... Let's just say you should go do some homework. LOL If they can even beat bean, they will be way to expensive. More than ele staff/wands. Nuff said? Kthxbye

HappyBoar 06/15/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

Shatterss said: " 120 my arse! Seems like you only know poor dexless wannabes. Dexless>low dex but it all depends in funding. Atm at higher lvs low dex is better but soon higher dexless claws will be released. And to some fool who mentioned timeless... Let's just say you should go do some homework. LOL If they can even beat bean, they will be way to expensive. More than ele staff/wands. Nuff said? Kthxbye" Low Dex >> Dexless Reason: the higher level you get, the bigger the w.atk/luk ratio gets. Assuming that you have 900 luk and 100 total w.atk, each extra w.atk is worth about 9 luk. A normal claw can easily have up to 10 base atk more than a dexless claw.

donovannnn 06/15/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

dude. just dont make a dexless unless you have atleast 1.5bil funding. otherwise they just suck.

shaq247 Jun 15 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

dont listen 2 all those people who just hate the dexless build, if u are really unfunded dexless is your only option dont go lowdex untill u can afford a good claw and and an ok base dex . just remember that being low dex means buying dex equips BTW i am a lvl 128 dexless sin who has crap equips (mainly because i got hacked) and i am just a bit below average compared 2 the other NL's my lvl

paco1234 Jun 15 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

wow everyone says you need like 1 bill of funding for dexless. no you dont im unfunded and i still hit 3k a star. if you wanna make a dexless go for it. dont listen to all he dmg whores who say you suck with out a lot of funding. *cough*donovannnn*cough* imo its worth it even if you dont have godly funding.

nerdit 06/15/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

I have been wondering the same thing. Currently I have a dexless lv 48 sin, with all his equips he hits on average 1k+, (2k+ with crit) on each star. I'm getting tired of my cb since I love pwnful damage and CB is hard to make good damage even with this 16 atk shield I dished out for. I'm thinking of switching over to my sin but I don't know anything about them. Dexless have to wear skanda forever? Is there some other dexless claw that's coming out? Better to be full dex with Timeless equips? and what the heck is low dex? What's the diff between equip luk and stats luk

pavchka 06/15/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

nerdit said: "I have been wondering the same thing. Currently I have a dexless lv 48 sin, with all his equips he hits on average 1k+, (2k+ with crit) on each star. I'm getting tired of my cb since I love pwnful damage and CB is hard to make good damage even with this 16 atk shield I dished out for. I'm thinking of switching over to my sin but I don't know anything about them. Dexless have to wear skanda forever? Is there some other dexless claw that's coming out? Better to be full dex with Timeless equips? and what the heck is low dex? What's the diff between equip luk and stats luk" I'd quit my CB if I were you. The Timeless Rampion (the Claw) requires 160 DEX. You're going to have to go low DEX or maybe even regular DEX for that. I forgot the ATT stats of the Rampion, though. :S I don't know if a DEXless Night Lord will be stronger or weaker than a poorly funded regular DEX Night Lord with a Rampion.

nerdit 06/15/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT

pavchka said: " I'd quit my CB if I were you. The Timeless Rampion (the Claw) requires 160 DEX. You're going to have to go low DEX or maybe even regular DEX for that. I forgot the ATT stats of the Rampion, though. :S I don't know if a DEXless Night Lord will be stronger or weaker than a poorly funded regular DEX Night Lord with a Rampion." I no understand ... lol. If I had the same amount of funding for both dexless or low dex with rampion, though, which would do more dmg?