12:33 BT
home > forums
lowdex sin question
basilmarket.com forums : Thief  |  15 posts archived
« prev list next » thread 1,263 of 1,441  (arrow keys work)
thread starter poopiehead May 02 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
i see ppl suggesting equips such as pac with +dex, fs with +dex ect ect. how come people dont say chaos'd pacs instead of dex pacs. wouldnt a 4atk pac be better than a 3atk with 10dex? since 1atk is prlly more than 10dex at 120+. same goes with fs.
xalex094 05/02/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
Your not getting the point of being low dex.
poopiehead 05/02/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
xalex094 said: "Your not getting the point of being low dex." to maximize ur atk?...i mean...isnt that the ultimate goal? wuts the point of having like...50 base dex but does 2k less dmg than some one with 70dex and 10more wep atk from pac and fs?
lighttemplar 05/02/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
low dex is only truly exceptional when you are extremely rich. take me for example. 45 base dex, +86 from equips, and i use 68 att casters. low dex allows you to wear higher level equips with higher attack while all your ap goes into luk
poopiehead 05/02/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
lighttemplar said: "low dex is only truly exceptional when you are extremely rich. take me for example. 45 base dex, +86 from equips, and i use 68 att casters. low dex allows you to wear higher level equips with higher attack while all your ap goes into luk" that doesnt answer my question >_>... im asking why do people use 10dex 3atk pacs instead of 4-5atk pacs with no dex..since the latter gives more dmg.
xalex094 05/02/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
poopiehead said: " to maximize ur atk?...i mean...isnt that the ultimate goal? wuts the point of having like...50 base dex but does 2k less dmg than some one with 70dex and 10more wep atk from pac and fs?" A low dex adds the right amount dex to equip a claw with a higher attack rather then a dexless with a lower attack claw like a skanda. If your funded and the claw is good you can easliy dish out more damage, and don't forget about the extra luck added from the dex cap.
lighttemplar 05/02/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
o thats easy. NLs need dex to wear equips, so instead of wasting ap on dex it goes straight into luk. 4-5 luk = 1 atk
poopiehead 05/02/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
xalex094 said: " A low dex adds the right amount dex to equip a claw with a higher attack rather then a dexless with a lower attack claw like a skanda. If your funded and the claw is good you can easliy dish out more damage, and don't forget about the extra luck added from the dex cap." im not comparing lowdex with dexless. im comparing a low dex with a 10dex 3atk pac with a 0dex 4/5 atk pac. the latter does more dmg but no1 ever says "buy a chaos'ed pac" or "buy a chaos'ed fs"
xalex094 May 02 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
poopiehead said: " im not comparing lowdex with dexless. im comparing a low dex with a 10dex 3atk pac with a 0dex 4/5 atk pac. the latter does more dmg but no1 ever says "buy a chaos'ed pac" or "buy a chaos'ed fs"" If you want to equip a higher claw you need to gain dex from equips. If your going to go with 0dex 3/5 atk pac you might as well go dexless, unless you got some other equip to cover the dex required.
lighttemplar 05/02/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
you're thinking based off of unlimited ap and basing your calculations only on att without the level and amount of ap restraints.
poopiehead 05/02/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
xalex094 said: " If you want to equip a higher claw you need to gain dex from equips. If your going to go with 0dex 3/5 atk pac you might as well go dexless, unless you got some other equip to cover the dex required." so ur saying... u'd rather use a 10dex/3atk pac + 5dex 2atk fs over 5atk pac and 5atk fs? even tho the latter adds more dmg?
Daniel 05/02/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
poopiehead said: " so ur saying... u'd rather use a 10dex/3atk pac + 5dex 2atk fs over 5atk pac and 5atk fs? even tho the latter adds more dmg?" I know where you're going with your logic. Chaos'ed pacs and facestompers are way better because of the attack bonus given. ATK>LUK/DEX. In the end, it's all about the weapon attack because it boosts your damage way higher than having low low dex to have extra luck.
AngelzCloud May 02 2009 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
1 att does= 16 dex though no one uses dex equips as an attack equip, they use it to wear equips so they dont need to add to their base dex. I have 80 base dex and i have +70 dex in equips.
poopiehead 05/02/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
AngelzCloud said: "Because 1 att = 4 luk, 4 dex= 1 luk, 5 att 0 stat pac = 4 att pac with 4 att or 3 att pac with 8 dex. Att pacs cost so much more where as luk scrolls only cost 5m per 60%." guides never even mentions chaos scrolls =.=..thats wut im saying. ppl automatically goes for dex even tho there are better choices. Daniel said: " I know where you're going with your logic. Chaos'ed pacs and facestompers are way better because of the attack bonus given. ATK>LUK/DEX. In the end, it's all about the weapon attack because it boosts your damage way higher than having low low dex to have extra luck." YEAH!
xalex094 05/02/09 + PM | QUOTE | PERMALINK | REPORT
Daniel said: " I know where you're going with your logic. Chaos'ed pacs and facestompers are way better because of the attack bonus given. ATK>LUK/DEX. In the end, it's all about the weapon attack because it boosts your damage way higher than having low low dex to have extra luck." This
« prev list next » thread 1,263 of 1,441  (arrow keys work)
BasilMarket is Copyright 2004-2008 BasilMarket.com (archive reconstruction). Data recovered from the Internet Archive Wayback Machine for the Classic MapleStory community.