Screen #117122
Submitted by legendypl
37 people liked it
Image not yet recovered.
recovery: metadata only
« prev full/medium gallery next » screen 3,157 of 8,392 in full/medium gallery  (arrow keys work)
Comments (15)
legendypl 07/16/08
Wow I was banned for saying coooool. Anywayz Ty for the great comments and I took one of your guys advice, and I used a 10% Overall Dex to end it. And if your in Bello, Offer :D
FrozenBladeV 07/16/08
Im jealous of that DCM. I hope it passes for you.
JCoolMage 07/16/08
Many people have exploded much better items out of greed by using a 30% or a 70% on the last slot. Use a 60% or risk a 35% chance that it either fails or is exploded (which will be exploded) Btw you need 139 accuracy, so 135 isn't enough. Nice try though. No-one cares the STR of your overall if your ignorance means no-one wants to talk to you.
Figgy 07/16/08
Kazekage942 said: " how can you even wear armors than need dex when you dont have dex in the first place because you're saying you get it from the armor -_- you're pathetic" almost all warrior equips have no dex requirements.
Kazekage942 07/16/08
1337XPBand1t said: "Well dexless warriors need Dex for weapons and helmets so they wear Dex armour!" how can you even wear armors than need dex when you dont have dex in the first place because you're saying you get it from the armor -_- you're pathetic
Freeinternet 07/16/08
Strength scrolls are for Bowmen, Warriors get a lot more out of dex scrolls because it gives both dexterity that adds accuracy and accuracy from the scroll too.
kulu
1337XPBand1t said: "Well dexless warriors need Dex for weapons and helmets so they wear Dex armour!" RIIIIIGHHHT tell me, have you ever seen a Dexless warrior look specifically for dex items? if there is a better counterpart CALLED ACCURACY ITEMS? I'd rather have 50 Accuracy than 50 Dex. *unless im trying to aim for Stonetooth* DO YOUR RESEARCH !
MULEman79 07/16/08
1337XPBand1t said: "Well dexless warriors need Dex for weapons and helmets so they wear Dex armour!" no .. they dont.. do some reasearch
BabyEater 07/16/08
1337XPBand1t said: "Well dexless warriors need Dex for weapons and helmets so they wear Dex armour!" I'm going to pretend you're being sarcastic.
yman9032 07/16/08
lol i have a 24 str chainmail in windia o.o
1337XPBand1t 07/16/08
BabyEater said: " The point is a dexless warrior doesnt NEED TO USE A DEX CHAINMAIL." Well dexless warriors need Dex for weapons and helmets so they wear Dex armour!
bSquad 07/15/08
BabyEater said: " Here's the statement I was defending [quote]The point is a dexless warrior doesnt NEED TO USE A DEX CHAINMAIL. Now then, I could have said. I'll have 135 accuracy without using AN OVERALL. But that would bring up two more options of which I could be quoted later on Are you using pants? Are you pants less? So I chose to stress that part." Hmm, you got me on that one. ;P OK then, you win.
BabyEater 07/15/08
bSquad said: " I'll just focus on the misunderstanding here. Here's what you said: Once I'm 90 I'll have 135 Accuracy USING PANTS. And my base dex is 6. You obviously thought here that he thought you could only be dexless with a chainmail, or you wouldn't have capitalized the USING PANTS. Prove me wrong. EDIT: Ok then, I guess italics don't work as I thought they would, bold instead. EDIT2: Ok then, looks like my bold is somehow screwed up, I'll stick with normal." Here's the statement I was def
bSquad
BabyEater said: " I didn't misunderstand him. I never addressed his argument. I backed up mine." I'll just focus on the misunderstanding here. Here's what you said: Once I'm 90 I'll have 135 Accuracy USING PANTS. And my base dex is 6. You obviously thought here that he thought you could only be dexless with a chainmail, or you wouldn't have capitalized the USING PANTS. Prove me wrong. EDIT: Ok then, I guess italics don't work as I thought they would, bold instead. EDIT2: Ok then, looks like my b
BabyEater 07/15/08
bSquad said: " Defending your argument does not mean you have to sink as low as he. But you're still avoiding the point here, you misunderstood him because he misunderstood you, his argument was wrong and so was yours. Are you saying you can hit any monsters if I simply gave you a weapon?" I didn't misunderstand him. I never addressed his argument. I backed up mine.
« prev full/medium gallery next » screen 3,157 of 8,392 in full/medium gallery  (arrow keys work)