man it sucks who wants to wast ethat much money on something that probably will not work............ can'r believe nexon made 3% clean slate scrolls

Iphu3niax said: " WHO said they are related? The scroll did; " If failed , the items will be destroyed at a 10% rate". 70% scrolls can't have a 50% destroy rate, if it's not related either. That would make the total probability 120%! So they must either have the destroy rate set if it doesn't work, or the rate calculated to - in 5% clean slate scrolls case - 9.5%." The guy I quoted said they are related. Brilliant powers of observation.

RandomPieBoy said: " Who said the two formulas are related? Do you know the code the programmers wrote for that sequence? What if they are independent variables? What if 10% is calculated based on its own solution? 10% destroyed, 90% just fail? I'm pretty sure programmers like to have independent variables just in case one code fails. Even if it was 9.5%, would they say 9.5%? Are you going to use 1000 of them to prove you're right? Didn't think so. Why? Because it's not important. Common sense."

CrossBolt said: "This thing destroys your items at a 9.5% rate. Are you guys too stupid to figure that out? 5% to work. 95% to fail 10% of 95% = 9.5% Simple math, people." Sorry but your simple fails fails hardcore.

CrossBolt said: "This thing destroys your items at a 9.5% rate. Are you guys too stupid to figure that out? 5% to work. 95% to fail 10% of 95% = 9.5% Simple math, people." Who said the two formulas are related? Do you know the code the programmers wrote for that sequence? What if they are independent variables? What if 10% is calculated based on its own solution? 10% destroyed, 90% just fail? I'm pretty sure programmers like to have independent variables just in case one code fails. Even if it w

CrossBolt said: "This thing destroys your items at a 9.5% rate. Are you guys too stupid to figure that out? 5% to work. 95% to fail 10% of 95% = 9.5% Simple math, people." Dude, if the scroll says that the destroy rate is at 10% I'm not going to do the math. And you are probably wrong because nexon isn't that smart.

mages96 said: "I think its too expensive for a lucky 5% and a unlucky 10%. Its like paying money to have it destroyed for 18m" That 10% is low compared to the dark scroll's 50%.

This thing destroys your items at a 9.5% rate. Are you guys too stupid to figure that out? 5% to work. 95% to fail 10% of 95% = 9.5% Simple math, people.

I think its too expensive for a lucky 5% and a unlucky 10%. Its like paying money to have it destroyed for 18m

dannyyan said: "then you can get an better than 21 att brown work glove?" no it will only restore slots that havefailed

then you can get an better than 21 att brown work glove?

i have no idea what these nerds are talking about

lol. i had a 3% one work on my icarus cape(2)... i was pretty surprised... would've sucked if the 6% destroy went into effect though >_>

Seems pretty cheap, but 5% is low though :D

There's 1%, 3%, and 5%. Supposedly it should not take up a scroll slot as you are trying to get rid of a bad one. That's why it doesn't add 8 slots to an item if it fails.