NYAHAHA said: " Grammar and spelling aren't the same thing. Good job jumping on the bandwagon of people attacking this guy for little things." Thank you.

it woulda been better if he said yea and there was an awesome 4th pan-whu? o.o

rofl super funny xD

hernando585 said: "My grammar senses are being repulsed by your lack of spelling skills. "Cloths" is spelled "clothes" unless they are actually wearing cloths in which case they should be in rags. "with out" is one word you genius. Nice try. EDIT: The plural of "story" is "stories" not "storys". Genius. EDIT 2: The second sentence has no period at the end." Grammar and spelling aren't the same thing. Good job jumping on the bandwagon of people attacking this guy for little things.

hernando585 said: "My grammar senses are being repulsed by your lack of spelling skills. "Cloths" is spelled "clothes" unless they are actually wearing cloths in which case they should be in rags. "with out" is one word you genius. Nice try. EDIT: The plural of "story" is "stories" not "storys". Genius. EDIT 2: The second sentence has no period at the end." LOL, you care about goddamn periods? Who cares? Also, you failed at grammar, "Genius." is not a complete sentence Also, grammar =/= spelling

omgits1337 said: " Einstein couldn't tie his shoes until he was 12 so just because someones spelling and grammar is incorrect does not mean you have to sarcastically call them a genius" actually 13 and he said driving a car was to complicated not to mention the schools thought he was mentally challenged thanks for supporting.

hernando585 said: "My grammar senses are being repulsed by your lack of spelling skills. "Cloths" is spelled "clothes" unless they are actually wearing cloths in which case they should be in rags. "with out" is one word you genius. Nice try. EDIT: The plural of "story" is "stories" not "storys". Genius. EDIT 2: The second sentence has no period at the end." Einstein couldn't tie his shoes until he was 12 so just because someones spelling and grammar is incorrect does not mean you have to sarcast

MagmaMoose said: "im sorry for my typos seriously im just starting dun flame meh!lol ty for good comments um y so soorry ima check now for all plz stop commenting on that"

davidsays said: " It's also "clothes" not "cloths". Edit: I should have looked at the previous posts. Sorry for stating the obvious." Eh its actually supposed to be clothings in this case... >.>

im sorry for my typos seriously im just starting dun flame meh!lol ty for good comments

PaperFans said: "Well, I think it should have went: GIRL: How do you like my new dress? DUDE: I think youll look better without it. GIRL: WITHOUT MY DRESS? DUDE: Without your bf, lawl. Yeah. That way the "it" can refer to the dress and the boyfriend without confusion." Agreed.

hm, lets question that black guy and his opinion of women, shall we? woman with clothes, for some odd reason, isnt better then a woman without a BF. ... i smell a twisted and bass ackwards sense of sexuality here. women without clothes is always better then almost anything else, except for 2 girls...*wink*

Qwalzz said: "My cloths link " =D Produced in Norway!

My cloths link

i like Luki's facial expression in the last panel ;D